TOWER OF HANOI PERFORMANCE OF RETARDED YOUNG-ADULTS AND NONRETARDED-CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF SOLUTION LENGTH AND GOAL STATE
TOWER OF HANOI PERFORMANCE OF RETARDED YOUNG-ADULTS AND NONRETARDED-CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF SOLUTION LENGTH AND GOAL STATE
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0022-0965(82)90008-x
复制
发表时间:
1982-01-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
DORANS, BA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
BORYS, SV;SPITZ, HH;DORANS, BA
Three experiments were conducted with the Tower of Hanoi task to assess problem solving ability in 6-, 7-, 8- and 10-yr-old nonretarded children and mentally retarded young adults of varying maturational ages. In experiment 1, the number of moves required for solution was gradually reduced until subjects could solve the 3-disk tower-ending problem. Although all groups experienced difficulty with the standard 7-move problem, all but the trainable retarded group readily solved the 6-move problem. The trainable group did not reach a comparable level of success until the 4-move problem. On the 7-move problem the retarded groups performed at the level of nonretarded groups that were maturationally 1.5-3 yr younger. An analysis of 1st moves indicated that subject groups differed in the strategies they used to solve the problems. In experiment 2, practice effects were ruled out as a source of the superior performance on the 6- than on the 7-move problem. In experiment 3, 7- and 10-yr-old nonretarded children and mentally retarded young adults did not differ on 5-move problems in which configuration of the goal stress was varied. A comparison of all 5-move problems judged to have the same depth of search requirements indicated that the tower-ending problems were significantly easier to solve than the partial-tower-ending problems, which in turn were easier than the flat-ending problems. A limited depth of search capacity sets boundaries on the use of sophisticated strategies and, to a large extent, accounts for the retarded groups'' maturational lag.