Mandarin version of the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: A valid instrument for assessing symptoms in Asians
Mandarin version of the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: A valid instrument for assessing symptoms in Asians
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1751-2980.12183
复制
发表时间：
2014-11-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Mahadeva, Sanjiv
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Leow, Hwong-Ruey;Ching, Siew-Mooi;Mahadeva, Sanjiv
目的编制中文版利兹消化不良问卷（M-LDQ），并在亚洲消化不良患者中进行验证。在初级和二级护理患者中评估了该工具的有效性、内部一致性、重测信度和反应性。结果共有184名患者（平均年龄54.0至15.8岁，其中59%为女性，72.3%至少受过中等教育），来自初级（n=100）和二级护理诊所（n=84）。M-LDQ各分量表的内部一致性（Cronbach 's0.79）和重测信度（斯皮尔曼相关系数0.78）均较好。M-LDQ在初级保健中诊断消化不良是有效的（受试者工作特征曲线下面积0.84），并且能够区分二级和初级保健患者（LDQ中位累积评分13.0 vs 3.0，P
ObjectiveTo develop and validate a Mandarin version of the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (M-LDQ) in Asian patients with dyspepsia.MethodsThe M-LDQ was developed according to standardized methods. The validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the instrument were evaluated in both primary and secondary care patients.ResultsA total of 184 patients (mean age 54.015.8 years, of whom 59% were women and 72.3% of whom had at least secondary level education) were recruited between August 2012 and March 2013, from both primary (n=100) and secondary care clinics (n=84). Both the internal consistency of all components of the M-LDQ (Cronbach's 0.79) and test-retest reliability (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.78) were good. The M-LDQ was valid in diagnosing dyspepsia in primary care (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.84) and was able to discriminate between secondary and primary care patients (median cumulative LDQ score 13.0 vs 3.0, P