Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements
Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047
复制
发表时间：
2019-02-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
de Jong, Martin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Raven, Rob;Sengers, Frans;de Jong, Martin
目前，人们对制度安排如何与城市实验共同演化知之甚少。本文利用新制度文献和最近的城市实验文献作为框架，探讨不同城市背景下制度安排如何以及为何有所不同。从经验上看，本文重点关注阿姆斯特丹、汉堡和宁波的智慧城市举措。这三个城市是采用全面智慧城市议程的领跑者，但它们的方式不同。本文考察了制度安排的监管、规范和认知要素，探讨了它们如何塑造实验，并反思了它们基于地点的特殊性。比较分析表明，实验的重点和方法可以被理解为依赖于多个空间尺度的战略机构和动态的（可能是独特的）组合。
Currently little is known about how institutional arrangements co-evolve with urban experimentation. This paper mobilizes neo-institutional literature and recent urban experimentation literature as a framework to explore how and why institutional arrangements differ across urban contexts. Empirically the paper focusses on smart city initiatives in Amsterdam, Hamburg and Ningbo. These three cities are frontrunners in adopting a comprehensive smart city agenda, but they do so in different ways. The paper examines regulative, normative and cognitive elements of institutional arrangements, explores how they shape experimentation, and reflects on their place-based specificities. The comparative analysis suggests that the focus of, and approach to, experimentation can be understood as resting in a (possibly unique) combination of strategic agency and dynamics at multiple spatial scales.