Classificatory Struggles: Class, Culture and Inequality in Neoliberal Times

Classificatory Struggles: Class, Culture and Inequality in Neoliberal Times
复制标题

分类斗争:新自由主义时代的阶级、文化和不平等

DOI:
10.1111/1467-954x.12296
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
The Sociological Review
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Imogen Tyler
Imogen Tyler
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Imogen Tyler

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

“阶级”概念所描述的问题是不平等。欧洲从工业资本主义向金融资本主义(新自由主义)的过渡导致了“国家内部和国家之间收入、健康和生活机会的不平等加剧,其规模是第二次世界大战前所未见的”(Hall等人,2014年:9)。在这种背景下,如果社会学要把握今天的不平等问题,阶级是一个基本的定位点。通过皮埃尔·布迪厄对阶级的关系理解,贝弗利·斯凯格斯对阶级斗争(价值之上)的理解,以及温迪·布朗关于新自由主义的特征是政治斗争的文化化的论点,本文追溯了阶级分析的形式,我们可以更好地理解区分后工业社会的阶级剥削形式。从雅克·朗西埃(Jacques Rancière)那里得到的启示是,阶级社会学不应该建立在对阶级身份的假设和价值化的基础上,而应该把阶级理解为反对分类的斗争。通过这种方式,社会学可以促进替代社会和政治的发展,以取代新自由主义治理的可处置性症状的生物政治学。
The problem that the concept of ‘class’ describes is inequality. The transition from industrial to financial capitalism (neoliberalism) in Europe has effected ‘deepening inequalities of income, health and life chances within and between countries, on a scale not seen since before the second world War’ (Hall et al., 2014: 9). In this context, class is an essential point of orientation for sociology if it is to grasp the problem of inequality today. Tracing a route through Pierre Bourdieu's relational understanding of class, Beverley Skeggs' understanding of class as struggles (over value), and Wendy Brown's argument that neoliberalism is characterized by the culturalization of political struggles, this article animates forms of class-analysis, with which we might better apprehend the forms of class exploitation that distinguish post-industrial societies. Taking a cue from Jacques Rancière, the central argument is that the sociology of class should be grounded not in the assumption and valorization of class identities but in an understanding of class as struggles against classification. In this way, sociology can contribute to the development of alternative social and political imaginaries to the biopolitics of disposability symptomatic of neoliberal governmentality.
条形码本质:战略归化作为事物基因组排序的创新实践
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.2010.01916.x
发表时间: 2010
期刊: The Sociological Review
影响因子: --
作者:
Waterton C
通讯作者: Waterton C