Total lipid, cholesterol, and fatty acids of farmed freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) and wild marine shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis, Penaeus schimitti, Xiphopenaeus kroyeri)
Total lipid, cholesterol, and fatty acids of farmed freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) and wild marine shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis, Penaeus schimitti, Xiphopenaeus kroyeri)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1006/jfca.2000.0981
复制
发表时间：
2001-08-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Rodriguez-Amaya, DB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bragagnolo, N;Rodriguez-Amaya, DB
测定了罗氏沼虾（Macrobrachium rosenbergium）和野生对虾（Penaeus brasiliensis、Penaeus schimitti、Xiphopenaeus kroyeri）的总脂、胆固醇和脂肪酸含量。海洋鱼类总脂含量为0.9-1.0 g/100 g，淡水鱼类为1.1 g/100 g。罗森伯托。样本来源和大小没有观察到显着差异。胆固醇水平从巴西对虾的114 mg/100 g到南美白对虾的139 mg/100 g。罗森伯托。大小对巴西云杉有显著影响，但对斯氏云杉无显著影响。来自两个州的虾（相同的物种和大小）没有显着差异。结果表明，海虾脂肪酸组成主要为C16：0、C20：5 n-3、C22：6 n-3、C18：1 n-9、C18：0、16：1 n-7、20：4 n-6和18：1 n-7。淡水对虾M.在迷迭香中，主要脂肪酸为C16：0、C20：5 n-3、C18：1 n-9、C18：0、C22：6 n-3、C18：2n-6、C17：0和C18：1 n-7。Quantification，M.罗氏沼虾与其它种类差异显著，克氏剑虾次之。一般而言，样品来源和尺寸没有显著影响。(C)北京：科学出版社.
Total lipid, cholesterol, and fatty acids were determined in freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) and in wild marine shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis, Penaeus schimitti, Xiphopenaeus kroyeri). The concentration of total lipid was 0.9-1.0 g/100 g in the marine species and 1.1 g/100 g in freshwater M. rosenbergii. No significant difference was observed in terms of origin of samples and size. Cholesterol levels ranged from 114 in Penaeus brasiliensis to 139 mg/100 g in M. rosenbergii. Size had a significant influence in P. brasiliensis but not in P. schimitti. Shrimp (same species and size) from two states did not differ significantly. The principal fatty acids in the marine shrimp were C16:0, C20:5n-3, C22:6n-3, C18:1n-9, C18:0, 16:1n-7, 20:4n-6, and 18: 1n-7. In the freshwater prawn M. rosenbergii, the major fatty acids were C16:0, C20:5n-3, C18:1n-9, C18:0, C22: 6n-3, C18:2n-6, C17:0, and C18:1n-7. Quantitatively, M. rosenbergii differed markedly from the other species, followed by Xiphopenaeus kroyeri. In general, origin of samples and size did not have a significant influence. (C) 2001 Academic Press.