A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques

A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques
复制标题

声音病理学功能评估的基本方案,特别是用于研究(声音外科)治疗的功效和评估新的评估技术

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2001
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
V. Woisard
V. Woisard
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Dejonckere;P. Bradley;P. Clemente;G. Cornut;L. Crevier;G. Friedrich;P. V. D. Heyning;M. Remacle;V. Woisard

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本基本方案的提出是为了在病理性嗓音的功能评价方法上达成更好的一致性和统一性。其目的是在介绍/发表语音治疗结果时,允许与文献进行相关比较,例如,声音外科技术,或用于调查病理语音的新/改进的仪器或程序。语音治疗结果的荟萃分析通常是有限的,甚至可能是不可能的,因为功能结果评估的方式存在很大的差异。一个多维的最小的基本测量适合所有“常见”的发音障碍。它包括五种不同的方法:感知(等级,粗糙度,呼吸),视频频闪镜检查(闭合,规则性,粘膜波和对称性),声学(抖动,闪烁,Fo范围和最软强度),空气动力学(发声商)和患者的主观评级。该方案是在详尽审查文献、委员会成员经验和欧洲喉学会全体讨论的基础上制定的。仪器保持在最低限度,但它被认为是必不可少的专业人士进行phonosurgery。
Abstract The proposal of this basic protocol is an attempt to reach better agreement and uniformity concerning the methodology for functional assessment of pathologic voices. The purpose is to allow relevant comparisons with the literature when presenting / publishing the results of voice treatment, e.g. a phonosurgical technique, or a new / improved instrument or procedure for investigating the pathological voice. Meta-analyses of the results of voice treatments are generally limited and may even be impossible owing to the major diversity in the ways functional outcomes are assessed. A multidimensional set of minimal basic measurements suitable for all “common” dysphonias is proposed. It includes five different approaches: perception (grade, roughness, breathiness), videostroboscopy (closure, regularity, mucosal wave and symmetry), acoustics (jitter, shimmer, Fo-range and softest intensity), aerodynamics (phonation quotient), and subjective rating by the patient. The protocol is elaborated on the basis of an exhaustive review of the literature, of the experience of the Committee members, and of plenary discussions within the European Laryngological Society. Instrumentation is kept to a minimum, but it is considered essential for professionals performing phonosurgery.
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3501.21
发表时间: 1992
期刊: Journal of speech and hearing research
影响因子: --
作者:
Titze,IR
通讯作者: Titze,IR