Writing PD
Writing PD
复制标题
写PD
DOI：
10.1145/3210604.3210615
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Light A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Light A
作为参与性过程的参与者，PD学者报告他们工作的实践和结果，从而形成对个别项目和更广泛的参与性设计领域的了解。目前，这种报道的主要形式是以学术出版模式为主导的。然而，描述他人的政治立场却鲜有人讨论。我们的领域为合作设计、进行实验和询问参与在不同背景下意味着什么带来了不同的敏感性。我们如何将这种设计的独创性与报道的独创性相匹配？设计师、研究人员和其他参与者是否都应该使用更新颖、更量身定制的方法来撰写参与性工作？我们应该写更开放、更有趣的协作文本吗？在一些学术话语中，作为反思的一部分，相当大的价值被放在反身性、位置性、包容性和自动民族志上。然而，PD没有花时间讨论其书面产出。借鉴PDC‘16研讨会的结果，我鼓励我们挑战这种沉默，讨论“写作PD”。
As participants in participatory process, PD academics report on the practices and outcomes of their work and thereby shape what is known of individual projects and the wider field of participatory design. At present, there is a dominant form for this reporting, led by academic publishing models. Yet, the politics of describing others has received little discussion. Our field brings diverging sensibilities to co-design, conducting experiments and asking what participation means in different contexts. How do we match this ingenuity in designing with ingenuity of reporting? Should designers, researchers and other participants all be writing up participatory work, using more novel and tailored approaches? Should we write more open and playful collaborative texts? Within some academic discourse, considerable value is placed on reflexivity, positionality, inclusivity and auto-ethnography as part of reflecting. Yet, PD spends no time in discussing its written outputs. Drawing on the results of a PDC'16 workshop, I encourage us to challenge this silence and discuss "Writing PD".