A comparison of four particulate bone derivatives.
A comparison of four particulate bone derivatives.
复制标题
四种颗粒骨衍生物的比较。
DOI:
10.1097/00003086-199106000-00041
复制
发表时间:
1991
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
D. E. Bach
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Hollinger;D. Mark;P. Goco;N. Quigley;R. W. Desverreaux;D. E. Bach
Samples of four types of particulate bone matrix derivatives were prepared and surgically inserted into standardized critical-sized defects in calvariae of Long-Evans rats. Implantation of demineralized bone matrix (DBM), bone regenerative matrix, and two types of particulate chemosterilized, antigen-extracted, autolyzed, allogeneic (AAA) bone from endochondral (eAAA) and intramembranous (iAAA) sources will result in the regeneration of bone in orthotopic skull defects. The four preparations were tested in orthotopic, 8-mm calvarial wounds to compare the quantity of new bone that formed 28 days postimplantation. Quantitative computer imaging was used to measure roentgenographic gray levels and bone volume of new trabeculae (calcified plus osteoid). All experimental bone matrix derivatives produced more bone volume than the nontreated control wounds. Bone volume regenerated from iAAA was significantly less than eAAA and DBM-regenerated bone.