Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning

Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00016.x
复制
发表时间:
2006-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Irvin, Sherri
Irvin, Sherri
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Irvin, Sherri

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文讨论作者意图与文学作品意义之间的关系(或缺乏关系)。它考虑了极端和适度的实际意向主义、约定主义和两种版本的假设意向主义的优缺点,并讨论了一个人对语言惯例的稳健性和文学作品的公开性的理论承诺在决定一个人接受哪种观点时应发挥的作用。
This article discusses the relationship (or lack thereof) between authors' intentions and the meaning of literary works. It considers the advantages and disadvantages of Extreme and Modest Actual Intentionalism, Conventionalism, and two versions of Hypothetical Intentionalism, and discusses the role that one's theoretical commitments about the robustness of linguistic conventions and the publicity of literary works should play in determining which view one accepts.