BRAIN POTENTIALS RELATED TO STAGES OF SENTENCE VERIFICATION
BRAIN POTENTIALS RELATED TO STAGES OF SENTENCE VERIFICATION
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920.x
复制
发表时间:
1983-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
PERRY, NW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
FISCHLER, I;BLOOM, PA;PERRY, NW
Subjects were shown the terms of simple sentences in sequence (e.g., A sparrow / is not / a vehicle) and manually indicated whether the sentence was true or false. When the sentence form was affirmative (i.e., X is a Y), false sentences produced scalp potentials that were significantly more negative than those for true sentences, in the region of about 250-450 ms following presentation of the sentence object. When the sentence form was negative (i.e., X is not a Y), it was the true statements that were associated with the ERP [event-related potential] negativity. Since both the false-affirmative and the true-negative sentences consist of mismatched subject and object terms (e.g., sparrow / vehicle), the negativity in the potentials reflected a semantic mismatch between terms at a preliminary stage of sentence comprehension, rather than the falseness of the sentence taken as a whole. Similarities between the present effects of semantic mismatches and the N400 associated with incongruous sentences are discussed. The pattern of response latencies and of ERP taken together supported a model of sentence comprehension in which negatives are dealt with only after the proposition to be negated is understood.