Adolescents' Psychosocial Maturity, Problem Behavior, and Subjective Age: In Search of the Adultoid
Adolescents' Psychosocial Maturity, Problem Behavior, and Subjective Age: In Search of the Adultoid
复制标题
青少年的心理社会成熟度、问题行为和主观年龄：寻找成人样
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Tilton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Galambos;L. Tilton
本研究的目的是寻求实证证实存在一组青少年的成熟状态可以标记为adultoid，并确定青少年的成熟状态的社会心理相关因素。209名以白色为主的青少年问卷数据的聚类分析（10-18岁）在工作和中产阶级双亲家庭中确定了3个成熟状态组：（心理社会成熟度低，问题行为高，主观年龄较大）;成熟（心理社会成熟度高，问题行为少，主观年龄稍大）;和不成熟（低心理社会成熟度，低问题行为，年轻的主观年龄）。回归显示，一些青少年和母亲报告的变量与成熟状态。相对于他们的成熟和不成熟的同行，adultoid青少年表现出更先进的身体成熟，更早的期望获得特权，更高的社会参与，并在男孩，更高的母亲-青少年冲突。成人样青少年确实存在，他们在重要方面不同于成熟和不成熟的青少年。这些结果对理解青少年成熟程度的多样性具有重要意义。
The objectives of this study were to seek empirical confirmation for the existence of a group of adolescents whose maturity status could be labeled as adultoid, and to identify psychosocial correlates of adolescents' maturity status. Cluster analysis of questionnaire data from 209 predominantly White adolescents (10-18 years old) in working- and middle-class 2-parent families identified 3 maturity status groups: adultoids (low psychosocial maturity, high problem behavior, older subjective age); matures (high psychosocial maturity, low problem behavior, slightly older subjective age); and immatures (low psychosocial maturity, low problem behavior, young subjective age). Regressions revealed that several adolescent- and mother-reported variables were linked to maturity status. Relative to their mature and immature counterparts, adultoid adolescents exhibited more advanced physical maturity, earlier expectations for attaining privileges, higher social involvement, and in boys, higher mother-adolescent conflict. Adultoid adolescents do exist, and they differ from mature and immature adolescents in important ways. These results have implications for understanding the diversity in adolescents' levels of maturity.
DOI：
10.1002/cd.23219873706
发表时间：
1987-09
期刊：
New directions for child development
影响因子：
--
作者：
D. Baumrind
通讯作者：
D. Baumrind
儿童面部成熟度对父母期望和惩罚的影响。
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Zebrowitz,LA;Kendall-Tackett,K;Fafel,J
通讯作者：
Fafel,J