Assemblage and critical urbanism
Assemblage and critical urbanism
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/13604813.2011.568715
复制
发表时间：
2011-04
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Colin Mcfarlane
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Colin Mcfarlane
这篇论文讨论了集合思维可能会提供什么批判性的都市主义。它试图与城市(2009)最近关于批判性都市主义的辩论联系起来，并在此基础上再接再厉，概述汇编为思考城市的政治和规范提供的三套贡献。首先，集合思维需要对通过历史与潜在(或现实与可能)的关系产生的城市进行描述性定位，特别是关于城市公地的集合和潜在的生成批判。第二，集合作为一个概念，由于其关注的是社会物质的相互作用和分配，它的作用是扰乱我们对代理和批评的构想。第三，聚集，作为拼贴、合成和聚集，提供了一个国际大都市的想象，是社会科学中最接近聚集概念的。这篇论文并不是试图在智力上或政治上提供与批判性都市主义漫长而多样的传统相反的集合性思维，而是对集合性思维与批判性都市主义之间的一些联系和区别进行了考察。
This paper offers a discussion of what assemblage thinking might offer critical urbanism. It seeks to connect with and build upon recent debates in City (2009) on critical urbanism by outlining three sets of contributions that assemblage offers for thinking politically and normatively of the city. First, assemblage thinking entails a descriptive orientation to the city as produced through relations of history and potential (or the actual and the possible), particularly in relation to the assembling of the urban commons and in the potential of ‘generative critique’. Second, assemblage as a concept functions to disrupt how we conceive agency and critique due to its focus on sociomaterial interaction and distribution. Third, assemblage, as collage, composition and gathering provides an imaginary of the cosmopolitan city, as the closest approximation in the social sciences to the assemblage idea. The paper is not an attempt to offer assemblage thinking as opposed, intellectually or politically, to the long and diverse traditions of critical urbanism, but is instead an examination of some of the connections and differences between assemblage thinking and strands of critical urbanism.