Peripheral afferents and spinal inhibitory system in dynamic and static mechanical allodynia.
Peripheral afferents and spinal inhibitory system in dynamic and static mechanical allodynia.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001055
复制
发表时间:
2017-12
期刊:
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Chung JM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
La JH;Chung JM
Mechanical allodynia is a debilitating pain from innocuous mechanical stimuli such as touch. To unravel its mechanism, one approach has been to focus on the fact that different afferent types mediate mechanical allodynia from stimuli “moving” across the skin (eg, brushing) and from stimuli “fixed” on a certain spot (eg, gentle pressure or weak punctate stimulation); the former type of allodynia being designated “dynamic” and the latter,“static” 23, 39 (these terms, however, differentiate mechanical allodynia by “stimulation mode,” not by afferent type). Thus, because the stimulation mode differs between dynamic and static mechanical allodynia, different afferent inputs are presumably generated and then differentially processed in the spinal cord. In this regard, recent literature suggests that inhibitory processing of afferent inputs by glycine-and g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transmission differs between dynamic and static mechanical allodynia, respectively. 36, 41 In addition to the dynamic/static stimulation mode, factors such as the size/depth of stimulated area (eg, large pressure probe vs von Frey filament) and the stimulation velocity/duration can influence mechanical allodynia because of spatial/temporal summation, counteraction between afferents, 2, 34 and afferents’ adaptation properties. Because the nature of afferent inputs and the spinal inhibitory processing seem to differ in the 2 types of mechanical allodynia, this review summarizes what we know of these issues in various pathological and experimental pain conditions. In this review, as a caveat, we do not deal with “mechanical hyperalgesia,” an increased pain from a mechanical stimulus that normally provokes pain.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Duan B;Cheng L;Bourane S;Britz O;Padilla C;Garcia-Campmany L;Krashes M;Knowlton W;Velasquez T;Ren X;Ross S;Lowell BB;Wang Y;Goulding M;Ma Q
通讯作者:
Ma Q
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Foster, Edmund;Wildner, Hendrik;Tudeau, Laetitia;Haueter, Sabine;Ralvenius, William T.;Jegen, Monika;Johannssen, Helge;Hoesli, Ladina;Haenraets, Karen;Ghanem, Alexander;Conzelmann, Karl-Klaus;Boesl, Michael;Zeilhofer, Hanns Ulrich
通讯作者:
Zeilhofer, Hanns Ulrich
影响因子:
0.9
作者:
Greenspan, JD;Thomadaki, M;McGillis, SLB
通讯作者:
McGillis, SLB
影响因子:
13.3
作者:
Garrison, Sheldon R.;Stucky, Cheryl L.
通讯作者:
Stucky, Cheryl L.
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Arcourt, Alice;Gorham, Louise;Lechner, Stefan G.
通讯作者:
Lechner, Stefan G.