Do People’s Perceptions of Neighborhood Bikeability Match "Reality"?
Do People’s Perceptions of Neighborhood Bikeability Match "Reality"?
复制标题
人们对社区可骑自行车的看法是否符合“现实”？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jennifer Dill
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Liang Ma;Jennifer Dill
人们对建筑环境的感知与客观测量是一样的吗？如果不是，客观环境和感知环境对骑行行为的相对作用是什么？本研究基于俄勒冈州波特兰市的数据，探讨了客观骑行环境与感知骑行环境之间的匹配或不匹配，以及它如何影响人们的骑行行为。描述性分析表明，在感知和客观测量之间存在公平的一致。老年人、有孩子的妇女、受教育程度较低和收入较低的人以及骑自行车较少的人倾向于认为他们的高自行车环境（客观衡量）是低自行车环境。除了社会人口统计因素外，本研究还发现社会环境在客观环境和感知环境之间的关系中也起着重要作用。最后，研究结果表明，实际建筑环境和感知建筑环境都与自行车行为有关，尤其是功利主义自行车行为。对于休闲自行车，本研究测量的客观环境属性不是显著因素，而感知确实有影响。
Do people perceive the built environment the same as one objectively measures it? If not, what are the relative roles of the objective versus the perceived environment on bicycling behavior? This study, based on data from Portland Oregon, explored the match or mismatch between the objective and perceived bicycling environment, and how it affects people’s bicycling behavior. The descriptive analysis indicated a fair agreement between perceived and objective measures. Older adults, women having children, less-educated and lower-income persons, and those who bicycle less tended to perceive their high-bikeable environment (measured objectively) as low- bikeable. In addition to the socio-demographics, this study also found social environment can play a role in the relationship between objective and perceived environment. Finally, results of this study indicated that actual and perceived built-environment both are associated with the bicycling behavior, particularly for utilitarian bicycling. For recreational bicycling, the objective environment attributes measured in this study are not significant factors, while the perceptions do matter.