Measuring Political Efficacy.
Measuring Political Efficacy.
复制标题
衡量政治效能。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Michael A. Maggiotto
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Craig;Michael A. Maggiotto
在政治行为研究中经常使用的一个概念是“政治效能感”，最初的定义是：“个人政治行为确实或能够对政治过程产生影响的感觉，即，履行公民义务是值得的这是一种感觉，即公民个人可以在实现这一变化中发挥作用”（坎贝尔等人，1954：187）。从概念上讲，这一定义包含两个相当不同的组成部分：政治效率和系统反应能力。例如，科尔曼和戴维斯（1976：189 190）认为，低政治效能感可能是一个功能。. .个人无法从对某些人做出响应的系统中引出响应，或共同无法从无响应的系统中引出响应。在前一种情况下，我们把自我当作态度客体来处理;在后一种情况下，系统才是态度客体。在操作上，Balch（1974）证明了标准的4项CPS疗效量表可分为两对项目？每一个与另一个相对不相关，每一个都表现出不同的模式与政治信任，政治参与和对政治抗议的态度等变量的关联。近年来，越来越多的实证研究区分了政治效能的两个维度。这些尺寸现在由CPS定义
A concept frequently employed in studies of political behavior is "sense of political efficacy," originally de fined as: "the feeling that individual political action does have, or can have, an impact upon the political process, i.e., that it is worth while to perform one's civic duties. It is the feeling that the individual citizen can play a part in bringing about this change" (Campbell et a I., 1954: 187). Conceptually, this definition contains two rather distinct components: poIiticaI effeetiveness and system responsiveness. For example, Coleman and Davis (1976:189 190) contend that A low sense of political efficacy could be a func tion of . . . personal inability to elicit a re sponse from a system which responds to some people, or shared inability to elicit a response from an unresponsive system. In the former case, we are dealing with the self as an attitude object; in the latter case it is the system which is the attitude object. Operationally, Balch (1974) demonstrated that the standard 4-item CPS efficacy scale breaks down into two pairs of items?each relatively uncorrelated with the other, and each exhibiting different patterns of association with such vari ables as political trust, political participation, and atti tudes toward politcal protest. In recent years, an increasing number of empirical studies have distinguished between the two dimensions of political efficacy. These dimensions now are defined by CPS