FAIRNESS AND PREFERENCE
FAIRNESS AND PREFERENCE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0022-1031(79)90047-7
复制
发表时间：
1979-01-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
SENTIS, KP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MESSICK, DM;SENTIS, KP
在假设的工作环境下，通过将两种公平模型拟合到受试者对“自我”和“他人”支付分配公平性的判断中，对两种公平模型进行了评估。无论是E. Walster、G. W. Walster和E. Berscheid（公平：理论与研究，波士顿：Allyn and Bacon， 1978）的公平公式，还是Harris （Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976,12, 194-209）的线性模型，都没有充分考虑到无论自我工作比他人多还是少的公平判断。受试者还被要求指出他们最喜欢的支付分配，这些偏好与公平判断显着不同。结果表明，公平判断受到多付自我倾向的影响。
Two equity models were evaluated by fitting them to subjects' judgments of the fairness of payment distributions to “self” and “other” under hypothetical work situations. Neither the E. Walster, G. W. Walster, and E. Berscheid (Equity: Theory and Research, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1978) equity formulation nor Harris' (Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976,12, 194–209) linear model adequately accounted for the fairness judgments regardless of whether self worked more or less than other. Subjects also were asked to indicate their most preferred payment distributions and these preferences were significantly different from the fairness judgments. Results suggested that fairness judgments were influenced by a bias in the direction of overpayment to self.