A Global Vascular Guidelines–Based Bypass-Preferred Population and Their Surgical Risk Among CLTI Patients Treated With Endovascular Therapy in a Real-World Practice

A Global Vascular Guidelines–Based Bypass-Preferred Population and Their Surgical Risk Among CLTI Patients Treated With Endovascular Therapy in a Real-World Practice
复制标题

基于全球血管指南的绕道首选人群及其在现实世界实践中接受血管内治疗的 CLTI 患者的手术风险

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
T. Mano
T. Mano
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Okamoto;O. Iida;M. Takahara;Y. Hata;M. Asai;M. Masuda;T. Ishihara;Kiyonori Nanto;T. Kanda;T. Tsujimura;Syota Okuno;Y. Matsuda;T. Mano

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的:确定在接受血管内治疗(EVT)的慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)人群中,根据全球血管指南(GVG),有多少患者被归类为首选旁路手术,并确定其手术风险。材料与方法:本研究分析了1043例在2010年4月至2017年12月期间表现为WIfI(伤口、缺血和足部感染)≥2期并接受EVT的CLTI患者。其中,176例因缺乏血管造影或其他数据而被排除,留下867例CLTI患者(平均年龄74±10岁; 523例男性)根据GVG分为旁路首选组、不确定组或EVT首选组。GVG建议,当伤口严重(WIfI分期≥3)和病变复杂(GLASS分期III)时,将旁路手术作为一线治疗。使用改良的PREVENT III风险评分估计手术风险。为了进一步根据死亡风险对旁路首选人群进行分层,使用递归划分构建了生存决策树。结果:旁路首选组占总人群的55% [95%置信区间(CI)51%至58%]。决策树分析提取了低死亡风险亚组,1个月生存率为99%(95% CI 98%至100%),2年生存率为80%(95% CI 73%至87%)。根据PREVENT III评分,34%(95%CI 27%-42%)的低死亡风险亚组被归类为高手术风险。结论:根据GVG,接受EVT的患者中有很高比例被认为是首选旁路,这些患者的生存率无论是高风险还是低风险都没有显著差异。
Purpose: To determine in a chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) population who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) how many patients would have been categorized as preferred for bypass surgery according to the Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) and ascertain their surgical risk. Materials and Methods: The current study analyzed 1043 CLTI patients who presented WIfI (wound, ischemia, and foot infection) stage ≥2 and underwent EVT between April 2010 and December 2017. Of these, 176 were excluded for lack of angiographic or other data, leaving 867 CLTI patients (mean age 74±10 years; 523 men) for stratification according to the GVG into bypass-preferred, indeterminate, or EVT-preferred groups. The GVG recommend bypass as the first-line treatment when the wound is severe (WIfI stage ≥3) and lesions are complex (GLASS stage III). Surgical risk was estimated using the modified PREVENT III risk score. To further stratify the bypass-preferred population according to mortality risk, a survival decision tree was constructed using recursive partitioning. Results: The bypass-preferred group accounted for 55% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51% to 58%] of the overall population. The decision tree analysis extracted a low-mortality risk subgroup with a survival rate of 99% (95% CI 98% to 100%) at 1 month and 80% (95% CI 73% to 87%) at 2 years. According to the PREVENT III score, 34% (95% CI 27% to 42%) of the low mortality risk subgroup were classified as high surgical risk. Conclusion: A high proportion of patients undergoing EVT were considered bypass preferred based on the GVG, and the survival of these patients was not significantly different whether they were high or low surgical risk.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016
发表时间: 2019-06
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Conte MS;Bradbury AW;Kolh P;White JV;Dick F;Fitridge R;Mills JL;Ricco JB;Suresh KR;Murad MH;GVG Writing Group
通讯作者: GVG Writing Group