Factors Associated With Knowledge and Experience of Self-managed Abortion Among Patients Seeking Care at 49 US Abortion Clinics.
Factors Associated With Knowledge and Experience of Self-managed Abortion Among Patients Seeking Care at 49 US Abortion Clinics.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8701
复制
发表时间:
2023-04-03
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Scott, James G.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aiken, Abigail R. A.;Tello-Perez, Luisa Alejandra;Madera, Melissa;Starling, Jennifer E.;Johnson, Dana M.;Broussard, Kathleen;Padron, Elisa;Ze-Noah, Carol Armelle;Baldwin, Aleta;Scott, James G.
This survey study evaluates the factors associated with knowledge and experience of self-managed abortion among patients seeking care at 49 US abortion clinics in 29 states. How commonly do US patients seeking an abortion consider or attempt self-managed abortion before attending a clinic, and what factors are associated with self-management behavior? In this survey study of 19 830 patients attending 49 abortion clinics in 29 states, 1 in 8 considered self-managing before attending the clinic, and of these, 1 in 3 attempted to do so. Individual-level factors, including experiencing clinic access barriers and preferring at-home care, were associated with self-management behavior. These findings suggest that considering self-managed abortion is a common part of the path to accessing care in a clinic, and those on the margins of clinic access or who prefer at-home care are more likely to self-manage. Patients attending US abortion clinics may consider or try self-managing their abortion before coming to the clinic, yet little is known about the factors associated with self-management behavior. To examine the prevalence and factors associated with considering or attempting a self-managed abortion before attending a clinic. This survey study included patients obtaining an abortion at 49 independent, Planned Parenthood, and academic-affiliated clinics chosen to maximize diversity in geographic, state policy, and demographic context in 29 states between December 2018 and May 2020. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to July 2021. Obtaining an abortion at a clinic. Knowledge of medications used to self-manage an abortion, having considered medication self-management before attending the clinic, having considered any method of self-management before attending the clinic, and having tried any method of self-management before attending the clinic. The study included 19 830 patients, of which 99.6.% (17 823 patients) identified as female; 60.9% (11 834 patients) were aged 20 to 29 years; 29.6% (5824 patients) identified as Black, 19.3% (3799 patients) as Hispanic, and 36.0% (7095 patients) as non-Hispanic White; 44.1% (8252 patients) received social services; and 78.3% (15 197 patients) were 10 weeks pregnant or less. Approximately 1 in 3 (34%) knew about self-managed medication abortion, and among this subsample of 6750 patients, 1 in 6 (1079 patients [16.1%]) had considered using medications to self-manage before attending the clinic. Among the full sample, 1 in 8 (11.7%) considered self-managing using any method before clinic attendance, and among this subsample of 2328 patients, almost 1 in 3 (670 patients [28.8%]) attempted to do so. Preference for at-home abortion care was associated with considering medication self-management (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; 95% CI, 2.94-4.21), considering any method of self-management (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.50-3.13), and attempting any method of self-management (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.69). Experiencing clinic access barriers was also associated with considering medication self-management (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.69-2.32) and considering any method of self-management (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.89-2.32). In this survey study, considering self-managed abortion was common before accessing in-clinic care, particularly among those on the margins of access or with a preference for at-home care. These findings suggest a need for expanded access to telemedicine and other decentralized abortion care models.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Grossman D;Baba CF;Kaller S;Biggs MA;Raifman S;Gurazada T;Rafie S;Averbach S;Meckstroth KR;Micks EA;Berry E;Raine-Bennett TR;Creinin MD
通讯作者:
Creinin MD
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Aiken, Abigail R. A.;Broussard, Kathleen;Scott, James G.
通讯作者:
Scott, James G.
影响因子:
13.8
作者:
Aiken ARA;Starling JE;Gomperts R
通讯作者:
Gomperts R
影响因子:
6.1
作者:
MUNDLAK, Y
通讯作者:
MUNDLAK, Y
DOI:
10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100075
发表时间:
2022-12-01
期刊:
SSM-QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH
影响因子:
--
作者:
Madera, Melissa;Johnson, Dana M.;Aiken, Abigail R. A.
通讯作者:
Aiken, Abigail R. A.