Are Peer Specialists Happy on the Job?

Are Peer Specialists Happy on the Job?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/prj0000259
复制
发表时间:
2018-03-01
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Salnaitis, Christina
Salnaitis, Christina
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jenkins, Sarah;Chenneville, Tiffany;Salnaitis, Christina

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:本研究旨在探讨角色明确性和工作培训对同行专家工作满意度的影响。方法:对国际同行专家协会的 195 名同行专家进行了一项由 3 部分组成的调查,评估工作培训、工作满意度和角色明确性。使用描述性统计、相关分析(包括多元线性回归和方差分析)对数据进行分析。结果:自学和在线培训方式与工作满意度呈负相关,而工作见习与工作满意度呈正相关。角色清晰度与工作满意度、工作培训满意度以及工作见习和一对一培训呈正相关。结论和实践启示:目前的研究结果表明,对同行专家使用自学和在线培训是禁忌的,这表明需要利用工作见习或培训方法,以允许同行专家与其同事之间进行个人互动。
Objective: This study was designed to examine the impact of role clarity and job training on job satisfaction among peer specialists. Method: A 3-part survey assessing job training, job satisfaction, and role clarity was administered online to 195 peer specialists who are members of the International Association of Peer Specialists. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlational analyses to include multiple linear regressions and analysis of variance. Results: Self-study and online training methods were negatively correlated with job satisfaction while job shadowing was positively correlated with job satisfaction. Role clarity was positively correlated with job satisfaction and job training satisfaction as well as job shadowing and one-on-one training. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The use of self-study and online training for peer specialists is contraindicated by current findings, which suggest the need to utilize job shadowing or training methods that allow for personal interaction between peer specialists and their colleagues.