A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds
A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02687040143000203
复制
发表时间：
2002-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Rapp, B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Goldrick, M;Rapp, B
口语单词生成理论通常假设从概念表征（例如，[furry、feline、home]）到音素（例如/k/、/ae/、/t/）的映射涉及基于意义的过程和基于声音的过程。该框架的一个核心问题是这两个过程如何相互作用。回顾了在交互性连续体上占据极端位置的两种理论：高度离散的位置（例如，Levelt，Roelofs，＆Meyer，1999），其中两个过程几乎独立发生；以及高度互动的立场（例如，Dell 等人，1997），其中两个过程对彼此施加相当大的相互影响。对经验数据的严格审查表明，这两种立场都无法解释全部研究结果。描述了另一种位置，即受限交互帐户（RIA）。通过结合高度离散和高度交互账户的各个方面，RIA 可以解释现有的经验数据，以及交互账户的最新挑战。
Theories of spoken word production generally assume that mapping from conceptual representations (e. g., [furry, feline, domestic]) to phonemes (e. g., /k/, /ae/, /t/) involves both a meaning-based process and a sound-based process. A central question in this framework is how these two processes interact with one another. Two theories that occupy extreme positions on the continuum of interactivity are reviewed: a highly discrete position (e. g., Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999), in which the two processes occur virtually independently; and a highly interactive position (e. g., Dell et al., 1997) in which the two processes exert considerable mutual influence over one another. Critical examination of the empirical data reveals that neither position can account for the full range of findings. An alternative position, the restricted interaction account (RIA), is described. By combining aspects of both highly discrete and highly interactive accounts, RIA can account for the existing empirical data, as well as for more recent challenges to interactive accounts.