FRUSTRATION AGGRESSION HYPOTHESIS - EXAMINATION AND REFORMULATION
FRUSTRATION AGGRESSION HYPOTHESIS - EXAMINATION AND REFORMULATION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59
复制
发表时间：
1989-07-01
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
BERKOWITZ, L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BERKOWITZ, L
检验了Dollard等人(1939)的挫折-攻击假说。最初的提法的主要主张仅限于干扰敌对(情绪)攻击预期目标的实现。尽管一些研究得出了否定的结果，但另一些研究支持核心命题。即使挫折不是武断的，也不是针对个人的，挫折也会造成攻击性倾向。解释和归因可以部分地从原始分析的角度来理解，但它们也可以影响阻挠的不愉快。对1939年模型的一项拟议修订认为，挫折会产生攻击性倾向，其程度会引发负面影响。回顾了关于厌恶事件攻击性后果的证据，并总结了伯克维茨的认知-新联想模型。
Examines the Dollard et al.(1939) frustration–aggression hypothesis. The original formulation's main proposition is limited to interference with an expected attainment of a desired goal on hostile (emotional) aggression. Although some studies have yielded negative results, others support the core proposition. Frustrations can create aggressive inclinations even when they are not arbitrary or aimed at the subject personally. Interpretations and attributions can be understood partly in terms of the original analysis but they can also influence the unpleasantness of the thwarting. A proposed revision of the 1939 model holds that frustrations generate aggressive inclinations to the degree that they arouse negative affect. Evidence regarding the aggressive consequences of aversive events is reviewed, and Berkowitz's cognitive–neoassociationistic model is summarized.