Comparison of 3 Optical Navigation Systems for Computer-Aided Maxillofacial Surgery
Comparison of 3 Optical Navigation Systems for Computer-Aided Maxillofacial Surgery
复制标题
DOI：
10.1001/archotol.134.10.1080
复制
发表时间：
2008-10-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Metzger, Marc Christian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Strong, E. Bradley;Rafii, Amir;Metzger, Marc Christian
目的：比较3种计算机辅助手术系统用于颌面重建的准确性。设计：3种计算机辅助手术系统的评价：StealthStation、VectorVision和Voxim。设置：加州大学戴维斯分校耳鼻喉科计算机辅助手术实验室。参与者：4个新鲜尸体头部。主要结果测量：平均目标配准误差。结果：StealthStation最准确（平均[SD]目标配准误差，1.00 [0.04] mm），其次是VectorVision（1.13 [0.05] mm），然后是Voxim（1.34 [0.04] mm）。所有数值均达到统计学显著性（P < .05）。结论：在评估的导航系统中发现了可测量的准确性差异。StealthStation是最准确的。然而，这些差异很小，对颌面部重建的临床意义可以忽略不计。
Objective: To compare the accuracy of 3 computeraided surgery systems for maxillofacial reconstruction.Design: Evaluation of 3 computer-aided surgery systems: StealthStation, VectorVision, and Voxim.Setting: The University of California, Davis, Department of Otolaryngology computer-aided surgery laboratory.Participants: Four fresh cadaveric heads.Main Outcome Measure: Mean target registration error.Results: The StealthStation was the most accurate (mean [SD] target registration error, 1.00 [0.04] mm), followed by VectorVision (1.13 [0.05] mm) and then Voxim (1.34 [0.04] mm). All values met statistical significance (P < .05).Conclusions: Measurable accuracy differences were found among the navigation systems evaluated. The StealthStation was the most accurate. However, the differences are small, and the clinical significance for maxillofacial reconstruction is negligible.