Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.
Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1
复制
发表时间:
2021-05
影响因子:
13.6
通讯作者:
Howe LD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carter AR;Sanderson E;Hammerton G;Richmond RC;Davey Smith G;Heron J;Taylor AE;Davies NM;Howe LD
Mediation analysis seeks to explain the pathway(s) through which an exposure affects an outcome. Traditional, non-instrumental variable methods for mediation analysis experience a number of methodological difficulties, including bias due to confounding between an exposure, mediator and outcome and measurement error. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can be used to improve causal inference for mediation analysis. We describe two approaches that can be used for estimating mediation analysis with MR: multivariable MR (MVMR) and two-step MR. We outline the approaches and provide code to demonstrate how they can be used in mediation analysis. We review issues that can affect analyses, including confounding, measurement error, weak instrument bias, interactions between exposures and mediators and analysis of multiple mediators. Description of the methods is supplemented by simulated and real data examples. Although MR relies on large sample sizes and strong assumptions, such as having strong instruments and no horizontally pleiotropic pathways, our simulations demonstrate that these methods are unaffected by confounders of the exposure or mediator and the outcome and non-differential measurement error of the exposure or mediator. Both MVMR and two-step MR can be implemented in both individual-level MR and summary data MR. MR mediation methods require different assumptions to be made, compared with non-instrumental variable mediation methods. Where these assumptions are more plausible, MR can be used to improve causal inference in mediation analysis. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
BARON, RM;KENNY, DA
通讯作者:
KENNY, DA
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Bowden J;Davey Smith G;Haycock PC;Burgess S
通讯作者:
Burgess S
DOI:
10.1097/ede.0000000000000161
发表时间:
2014-11
期刊:
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Burgess S;Davies NM;Thompson SG;EPIC-InterAct Consortium
通讯作者:
EPIC-InterAct Consortium
影响因子:
7
作者:
Goldsmith, Kimberley A.;MacKinnon, David P.;Pickles, Andrew
通讯作者:
Pickles, Andrew
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Jose, Paul E.
通讯作者:
Jose, Paul E.