The Cepheid distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud and NGC 4258 by the surface brightness technique and improved calibration of the cosmic distance scale
The Cepheid distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud and NGC 4258 by the surface brightness technique and improved calibration of the cosmic distance scale
复制标题
通过表面亮度技术和改进的宇宙距离标度校准计算造父变星到大麦哲伦星云和 NGC 4258 的距离
DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13884.x
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
G. Benedetto
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Benedetto
I report on the implementation of the surface brightness (SB) technique aimed at deriving reliable Cepheid angular diameters at optical wavelengths and then Baade-Wesselink (BW) distances using spectroscopic linear radii. The technique is applied to calibrate the Galactic distance scale and the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) based on this Galactic calibration. The LMC distance benefits from the large number of Cepheids with high-precision photometry and reddening data available by the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment of Udalski et al. and from improvements and refinements, including (i) a least-squares (LS) fitting approach to the individual distances to recover the distance modulus unbiased by the period distribution of target Cepheids and (ii) a better understanding of the metallicity effects on the period-luminosity relations and SB scales. The resulting true distance modulus of the LMC is μ 0 (LMC) = [18.559 ± 0.003 (random) ± 0.026 (systematic)] mag. The SB technique is also applied to confidently determine the Cepheid distance to the maser host galaxy NGC 4258. Cepheids in the inner region with near solar metallicity yield a true distance modulus of μ 0 (NGC 4258) = [29.28 ± 0.03 (random) ± 0.03 (systematic)] mag, in excellent agreement, at the 0.01 mag level, with the high-weight geometric water maser distance modulus. It is shown that the current data-reduction approach of averaging individual Cepheid distances can introduce significant systematic errors in the distance scale calibration. From a small sample of Hubble Space Telescope (HST) based galaxies, I derive an overall error of (12 ± 5) per cent, which would suggest a downward revision of the Freedman et al. Hubble constant to the value H 0 = (63 ± 7) km s -1 Mpc -1 , other things being equal.