A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Multidimensional Pain Readiness to Change Questionnaire 2 for Japanese Individuals With Chronic Pain
A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Multidimensional Pain Readiness to Change Questionnaire 2 for Japanese Individuals With Chronic Pain
复制标题
针对日本慢性疼痛患者的多维疼痛准备改变问卷 2 的跨文化验证
DOI：
10.1111/papr.12782
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Fukui S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adachi T;Sunohara M;Ogawa M;Enomoto K;Fujita Y;Mizuno Y;Miki K;Yukioka M;Maeda L;Nishiwaki Y;Itoh K;Nakanishi M;Iwashita N;Kitagawa H;Sasaki J;Jensen MP;Fukui S.
多维度疼痛改变准备问卷2（MPRCQ 2）是一种可靠有效的测量方法，用于评估采用各种离散疼痛自我管理反应的准备情况。我们试图翻译和评估的心理测量学特性的日本版的MPRCQ 2（MPRCQ 2-J）在个人慢性pain.MethodsOne一百七十三个人与慢性疼痛被要求完成MPRCQ 2-J，以及评估疼痛强度，疼痛干扰，自我效能感和一般准备采取自我管理的方法疼痛的措施。这些参与者中有48人提供了额外的MPRCQ 2-J数据，以评估重测信度。ResultsThe结果支持一个2因素的结构的MPRCQ 2-J时，误差协方差之间的一些9个主要尺度被允许。除总分（α = 0.68）外，观察到MPRCQ 2-J量表（Cronbach α范围为0.71 - 0.86）的内部评分充分。然而，仅发现59%的MPRCQ 2-J量表具有足够的重测信度（组内相关系数≥ 0.60）。MPRCQ 2-J证明了其结构效度通过确认预测模式的关联与有效性标准措施和参与运动treatment.DiscussionThe研究结果支持内部一致性（除总分）和结构效度MPRCQ 2-J量表的预期效果。然而，也提出了一些量表的重测信度的潜在局限性。MPRCQ 2-J可用于检查疼痛自我管理反应的特定准备域在日本慢性疼痛患者的调整过程中可能发挥的作用。
ObjectivesThe Multidimensional Pain Readiness to Change Questionnaire 2 (MPRCQ2) is a reliable and valid measure that assesses readiness to adopt a variety of discrete pain self‐management responses. We sought to translate and evaluate psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the MPRCQ2 (MPRCQ2‐J) in individuals with chronic pain.MethodsOne hundred seventy‐three individuals with chronic pain were asked to complete the MPRCQ2‐J, as well as measures assessing pain intensity, pain interference, self‐efficacy, and general readiness to adopt a self‐management approach for pain. Forty‐eight of these participants provided additional MPRCQ2‐J data to assess test‐retest reliability.ResultsThe findings supported a 2‐factor structure of the MPRCQ2‐J when error covariances between the some of the nine primary scales were allowed. Adequate internal consistencies of the MPRCQ2‐J scales (Cronbach's α ranged 0.71 to 0.86), except for the total score (α = 0.68), were observed. However, adequate test‐retest reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.60) were found for only 59% of the MPRCQ2‐J scales. The MPRCQ2‐J evidenced its construct validity via confirmation of the predicted patterns of associations with validity criterion measures and the anticipated effects of participation in an exercise treatment.DiscussionThe findings support the internal consistency (except for the total score) and construct validity for MPRCQ2‐J scales. However, potential limitations with respect to test‐retest reliability of some of the scales were also suggested. The MPRCQ2‐J can be used to examine the role that specific readiness domains of pain self‐management responses may play in an adjustment process in Japanese individuals with chronic pain.