Theorising (with) urban China, across the border: Two sides of the same coin
Theorising (with) urban China, across the border: Two sides of the same coin
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/20438206231195670
复制
发表时间：
2023-08
影响因子：
27.5
通讯作者：
S. S. Teo-S.;C. Chung;Zheng Wang
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. S. Teo-S.;C. Chung;Zheng Wang
为了回应中国城市研究中的例外主义文化，我们的文章“与中国城市理论”提出了利用中国城市案例来发展一个更全球化的城市理论的不同方法。这一方针雄心勃勃，需要进一步澄清。四位评论员的慷慨描述引发了两个方面的重大问题和思考：第一，理论化与中国城市理论化之间的关系，第二，中国城市研究中跨境合作的实用性。这种回应认为，城市中国的理论化和与城市中国的理论化是同一枚硬币的两面;理论化和理论化之间的互补性可以通过跨中国边境的合作来实现。
Responding to the culture of exceptionalism in urban China studies, our article ‘Theorising with urban China’ proposed different ways of leveraging urban China cases to develop a more global urban theory. Such an approach is ambitious and requires further clarification. The generous accounts of four commentators generated big questions and reflections on two fronts: first, on the relationship between theorising and theorising with urban China, and second, on the practicalities of cross-border collaboration in urban China research. This response argues that theorising urban China and theorising with urban China are two sides of the same coin; and that the complementarities between empiricism and theorisation can be fulfilled through collaborations across the Chinese border.