The Use of the Fluorescence Signal in Studies of Seagrasses and Macroalgae
The Use of the Fluorescence Signal in Studies of Seagrasses and Macroalgae
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/978-90-481-9268-7_9
复制
发表时间：
2010-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Borowitzka, Michael A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Enriquez, Susana;Borowitzka, Michael A.
随着我们对可变叶绿素荧光的理解的加深，用来描述可变叶绿素荧光的各种成分的术语也随之演变。对于新加入的Toin vivoChallla(Chl-a)荧光研究来说，最令人困惑的方面之一可能是使用了大量的术语和符号，其中许多术语和符号通常指的是同一参数。几个标准化荧光记数法的建议，最著名的是van Kooten和Snel(1990)和Maxwell和Johnson(2000)，在最近的出版物中减少了这种变化的程度，但仍然发生了一些变化(Baker和Oxborough 2004)。此外，近年来，随着新的仪器允许研究人员在一项研究中应用几种技术，所使用的符号必然变得更加复杂。在这种情况下，记法还必须区分技术(例如，单次周转与多次周转)或方法(例如，稳定状态光曲线与非稳定状态光曲线)。
The terminology used to describe the various components of variable chlorophyll fluorescence has evolved as our understanding of variable chlorophyll fluorescence has increased. For the newcomer toin vivochlorophylla(chl-a) fluorescence studies one of the most confusing aspects can be the large number of terms and notations used, many of which often refer to the same parameter. Several proposals to standardise fluorescence notation, most notably by van Kooten and Snel (1990) and Maxwell and Johnson (2000), have reduced the extent of this variation in more recent publications, but some variation still occurs (Baker and Oxborough 2004). Furthermore, in recent years the notation used necessarily has become more complex as new instruments have allowed researchers to apply several techniques within a single study. On such occasions it is essential that notation also distinguishes between techniques (e.g. single turnover vs. multiple turnover) or method (e.g. steady-state light curve vs. non-steady-state light curve).