Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files
Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2
复制
发表时间：
2007-12-01
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Diaz, Sebastian R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Davis, Mark S.;Riske-Morris, Michelle;Diaz, Sebastian R.
对研究不端行为的原因进行的实证研究相对较少。为了开始解决这一空白，作者从研究诚信办公室(ORI)的已结案档案中收集了数据。这些数据的形式是从ORI档案文件中提取的陈述，包括成绩单、调查报告、证人陈述和通信。研究人员将这些陈述分配给了44个不同的概念。然后使用多维尺度和聚类分析对这些概念进行了分析。作者选择了一个由七组组成的解决方案：(1)个人和职业压力源，(2)组织氛围，(3)工作不安全感，(4)合理化A，(5)个人压抑，(6)合理化B，(7)个性因素。作者讨论了他们的发现对政策和未来研究的影响。
There has been relatively little empirical research into the causes of research misconduct. To begin to address this void, the authors collected data from closed case files of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI). These data were in the form of statements extracted from ORI file documents including transcripts, investigative reports, witness statements, and correspondence. Researchers assigned these statements to 44 different concepts. These concepts were then analyzed using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. The authors chose a solution consisting of seven clusters: (1) personal and professional stressors, (2) organizational climate, (3) job insecurities, (4) rationalizations A, (5) personal inhibitions, (6) rationalizations B and, (7) personality factors. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for policy and for future research.