Honorary fellowship awards and professional development in psychiatry
Honorary fellowship awards and professional development in psychiatry
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/bf03340057
复制
发表时间：
1999-12-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Roberts, B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Roberts, LW;Warner, TD;Roberts, B
专业组织每年颁发荣誉奖学金，以表彰精神科学员的成就和未来的希望。没有公布任何数据来评估获奖者的特点或对获奖者的影响。一个50个项目的工具，以测试四个假设。这份机密调查表是邮寄给六个主要的专业精神病协会所确定的获奖者的。通过比较卡方（2）统计和重复测量多变量方差分析的响应来分析数据。对来自五个组织的获奖者（N=182，回复率= 55%）的回复进行了分析。研究金被认为有助于专业发展。某些与研究金有关的经验被认为比其他经验更重要，这些经验因颁发组织和性别而异。这些奖项的重要性没有获奖者预期的那么高。获奖者重视与同事、领导或导师的会面、与奖项相关的声望、网络以及对学术和组织精神病学的学习。丰富辅导机会被认为是一个需要改进的领域。接受者描述了后来参与专业组织的情况。荣誉奖学金获得者代表了一个广泛成就的精神科医生群体，他们报告说，他们的奖学金经验总体上有利于他们的职业发展。奖学金计划中的感知差异应根据其不同的目标，组成和结构来解释。奖学金计划应考虑加大对获奖者的指导力度。
Honorary fellowship awards are given each year by professional organizations ill recognition of the achievements and future promise of psychiatric trainees. No data have been published to evaluate the characteristics of, or effects on, awardees. A 50-item instrument was developed to test four hypotheses. The confidential survey ic,as mailed to award recipients identified by six major professional psychiatric associations. Data were analyzed by comparing responses with chi(2) statistics and repeated measures multivariate analyses of variance. Responses from the award recipients from five of the organizations (N=182, response rate = 55%) were analyzed. Fellowship awards were perceived as helpful to professional development.. Certain fellowship-related experiences were seen as more important than others, and these varied as a function of the awarding organization and by gender. The awards had less importance than the recipients expected. Meeting with colleagues and leaders or mentors, prestige associated with the awards, networking, and learning about academic and organizational psychiatry were valued by the recipients. Enrichment of mentoring opportunities was identified as an area for improvement. The recipients described later involvement with professional organizations. Honorary fellowship award recipients represent a widely accomplished group of psychiatrists, who report their fellowship award experiences overall as beneficial to their career development. Perceived differences in fellowship programs should be interpreted in light of their varying goals, composition, and structures. Greater efforts to mentor awardees should be considered by fellowship programs.