Alterations in growth and body composition during puberty. I. Comparing multicompartment body composition models.
Alterations in growth and body composition during puberty. I. Comparing multicompartment body composition models.
复制标题
青春期生长和身体成分的变化。
DOI：
10.1152/jappl.1997.83.3.927
复制
发表时间：
1997
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rogol,AD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Roemmich,JN;Clark,PA;Weltman,A;Rogol,AD
Roemmich, James N., Pamela A. Clark， Arthur Weltman和Alan D. Rogol。青春期生长和身体组成的变化。1 .多室体组成模型的比较。达成。生理学报，32(3):927-935,1997。-采用身体组成的四室（4C）模型作为判定三室（3C）和两室（2C）模型在预估青春期前和青春期男孩（生殖器I和II，n= 17；生殖器III和IV，n= 7）和女孩（乳房I和II，n= 8；乳房III和IV，n= 15）体脂百分比（%BF）的准确性的标准。评估了3C水密度（3C- h2o）和3C矿物密度模型、双能x射线吸收测定法、Lohman年龄调整方程、Slaughter等人的皮肤褶方程、Houtkooper等人和Boileau等人的生物电阻抗方程。与4C模型的一致性随着室数（即体水、骨矿物质）的测量而增加。除3C-H2O模型外，其他模型的一致性限制较大，对个体的表现不佳。双能x线吸收法的平均BF %（23.6%）大于标准4C法（21.7%）。对于场方法，Slaughter等人的皮肤折叠方程比Houtkooper等人和Boileau等人的生物阻抗方程表现得更好。随着成熟，无脂肿块水化率降低（生殖器I和II = 75.7%，生殖器III和IV = 74.8%，乳房I和II = 75.5%，乳房III和IV = 74.4%），矿物质含量增加（生殖器I和II = 4.9%，生殖器III和IV = 5.0%，乳房I和II = 5.1%，乳房III和IV = 5.7%）。随着成熟，无脂肿块密度也随之增加（生殖器I和II = 1.084 g/ml，生殖器III和IV = 1.087 g/ml，乳房I和II = 1.086 g/ml，乳房III和IV = 1.091 g/ml）。所有模型都降低了Siri 2C模型的%BF超预测，但只有4C和3C-H2O模型可以作为儿童和青少年身体成分验证的标准方法。
Roemmich, James N., Pamela A. Clark, Arthur Weltman, and Alan D. Rogol.Alterations in growth and body composition during puberty. I. Comparing multicompartment body composition models.J. Appl. Physiol.83(3): 927–935, 1997.—A four-compartment (4C) model of body composition was used as a criterion to determine the accuracy of three-compartment (3C) and two-compartment (2C) models to estimate percent body fat (%BF) in prepubertal and pubertal boys (genital I & II,n= 17; genital III & IV,n= 7) and girls (breast I & II,n= 8; breast III & IV,n= 15). The 3C water-density (3C-H2O) and 3C mineral-density models, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, the Lohman age-adjusted equations, the Slaughter et al. skinfold equations, and the Houtkooper et al. and Boileau bioelectrical impedance equations were evaluated. Agreement with the 4C model increased with the number of compartments (i.e., body water, bone mineral) measured. Except for the 3C-H2O model, the limits of agreement were large and did not perform well for individuals. The mean %BF by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (23.6%) was greater than that of the criterion 4C method (21.7%). For the field methods, the Slaughter et al. skinfold equations performed better than did the Houtkooper et al. and Boileau bioimpedance equations. The hydration of the fat-free mass decreased (genital I & II = 75.7%, genital III & IV = 74.8%, breast I & II = 75.5%, breast III & IV = 74.4%) and the mineral content increased (genital I & II = 4.9%, genital III & IV = 5.0%, breast I & II = 5.1%, breast III & IV = 5.7%) with maturation. The density of the fat-free mass also increased (genital I & II = 1.084 g/ml, genital III & IV = 1.087 g/ml, breast I & II = 1.086 g/ml, breast III & IV = 1.091 g/ml) with maturation. All of the models reduced the %BF overprediction of the Siri 2C model, but only the 4C and 3C-H2O models should be used as criterion methods for body composition validation in children and adolescents.