Re-viewing informality: perspectives from urban Asia
Re-viewing informality: perspectives from urban Asia
复制标题
重新审视非正规性：亚洲城市的视角
DOI：
10.3828/idpr.2012.21
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Andrew Harris
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Bunnell;Andrew Harris
尽管非正规部门和非正规性在城市化进程中的重要性在更广泛的发展研究、建筑、规划和城市研究中得到越来越广泛的认可，但对于如何定义和将它们作为研究对象，存在相当大的分歧。本主题部分的三篇论文都试图重新审视或重新审视亚洲城市非正规性的各个方面。这里收集的论文的共同点是在亚洲实证研究的基础上扩展对城市非正规性的思考方式。整个主题部分的目的不是提供某种（单一的）新的看待或处理城市非正式性的方式，也不是提出亚洲对非正式性的独特看法。相反，这些贡献既包括非正规性工作的概念多样性，也包括亚洲“非正规”活动和场所的经验多样性。因此，亚洲的经验案例被视为理论资源......
While the importance of the informal sector and informality in processes of urbanisation is increasingly widely acknowledged across development studies, architecture, planning and urban studies more broadly, there is considerable disagreement on how they should be defined and approached as objects of study. The three papers in this themed section all seek to re-view - or to look anew at - diverse aspects of urban informality in Asia. What the papers assembled here have in common is an orientation towards extending ways of thinking about urban informality on the basis of empirical research in Asia. The aim of the themed section as a whole is not one of proffering some (singular) new way of seeing or doing urban informality, nor is it to posit a specifically Asian take on informality. Rather, the contributions embrace both the conceptual diversity of work on informality and the empirical diversity of ‘informal’ activities and places in Asia. Asian empirical cases are thus treated as resources for theoretica...