Scholarship and practice: bridging the divide.
Scholarship and practice: bridging the divide.
复制标题
学术与实践：弥合鸿沟。
DOI：
10.5014/ajot.59.2.231
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Kielhofner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Kielhofner
有证据表明，学术界关于职业的成长理论和研究并没有始终如一地转化为职业治疗实践。相反，从业者经常报告说，他们发现这样的理论和研究与日常工作的相关性有限和/或难以实施。虽然许多因素造成了这种学术与实践的差距，但一个重要的因素是学术界传统上如何看待和产生知识。讨论了关于学术知识及其与职业治疗内外实践的关系的传统观点的变化。从参与式研究的经验中，研究了职业治疗奖学金可以更清楚地扎根于日常实践的方法。考虑到研究人员和实践者如何分享权力并进行更有效的对话。
There is evidence that the growth theory and research about occupation produced by academics are not consistently translated into occupational therapy practice. Rather, practitioners often report finding such theory and research to be of limited relevance to and/or difficult to implement in their everyday work. Although many factors contribute to this academic-practice gap one important contributor is how knowledge is traditionally viewed and generated in academia. Changes in traditional views about academic knowledge and its relationship to practice both outside and within occupational therapy are discussed. Ways that occupational therapy scholarship can be more clearly grounded in everyday practice are examined drawing from experience with participatory research. Consideration is given to how researchers and practitioners might share power and have a more effective dialogue.