Computerised adaptive testing accurately predicts CLEFT-Q scores by selecting fewer, more patient-focused questions

Computerised adaptive testing accurately predicts CLEFT-Q scores by selecting fewer, more patient-focused questions
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.bjps.2019.05.039
复制
发表时间:
2019-11-01
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris J.
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris J.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Harrison, Conrad J.;Geerards, Daan;Sidey-Gibbons, Chris J.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)最近就腭裂护理综合评估的核心结果集达成一致,该结果集更加强调患者报告的结果测量(PROMS),特别是cleft - q。CLEFT-Q包括12个量表,总共110个题目,旨在让8岁的孩子回答。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在使用计算机化自适应测试(CAT)来减少预测每个CLEFT-Q量表结果所需的项目数量。方法:我们使用一个开源的CAT模拟包,在每个全长量表及其CAT对应量表上以不同程度的精度运行项目反应,通过标准误差(SE)估计。为每个量表的CAT记录达到给定SE所需的平均项目数,并计算全长量表结果与CAT版本预测结果之间的相关性。结果:对12个CLEFT-Q量表中的每个量表使用CAT,我们减少了参与者需要回答的问题数量,即从110个减少到平均43.1个(范围34-60,SE < 0.55),同时保持CAT得分与全长量表之间97%的相关性。结论:CAT可能在临床实践中发挥了重要作用,因为它可以用更少的项目实现高度的准确性。(C) 2019年英国整形、重建和美容外科医生协会。Elsevier Ltd.出版。
Background: The International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM) has recently agreed upon a core outcome set for the comprehensive appraisal of cleft care, which puts a greater emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and, in particular, the CLEFT-Q. The CLEFT-Q comprises 12 scales with a total of 110 items, aimed to be answered by children as young as 8 years old.Objective: In this study, we aimed to use computerised adaptive testing (CAT) to reduce the number of items needed to predict results for each CLEFT-Q scale.Method: We used an open-source CAT simulation package to run item responses over each of the full-length scales and its CAT counterpart at varying degrees of precision, estimated by standard error (SE). The mean number of items needed to achieve a given SE was recorded for each scale's CAT, and the correlations between results from the full-length scales and those predicted by the CAT versions were calculated.Results: Using CATs for each of the 12 CLEFT-Q scales, we reduced the number of questions that participants needed to answer, that is, from 110 to a mean of 43.1 (range 34-60, SE < 0.55) while maintaining a 97% correlation between scores obtained with CAT and full-length scales.Conclusions: CAT is likely to play a fundamental role in the uptake of PROMs into clinical practice given the high degree of accuracy achievable with substantially fewer items. (C) 2019 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd.