naming and defining 'domestic violence': lessons from research with violent men

naming and defining 'domestic violence': lessons from research with violent men
复制标题

DOI:
10.1057/fr.2015.52
复制
发表时间:
2016-02-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Westmarland, Nicole
Westmarland, Nicole
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kelly, Liz;Westmarland, Nicole

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在本文中,我们利用的数据,从深入采访的男性谁曾使用暴力和虐待的亲密伴侣关系提供了一个新的透镜,通过它来查看命名,定义和理解“家庭暴力”的概念辩论,以及政策和实践的影响,从他们流。我们认为,减少家庭暴力离散的“事件”的支持和维护如何男人自己谈论他们使用暴力,这反过来又重叠的争论适当的干预和应对家庭暴力肇事者。我们重新审视赫恩的1998年的工作的暴力的男人,连接到斯塔克后来的概念,强制控制,以发展和扩大理解暴力通过分析那些谁使用it.We的话的影响,探索这些研究结果的影响最近法律的改革在英格兰和威尔士和政策,我们如何处理肇事者。
In this paper we draw on data from in-depth interviews with men who have used violence and abuse within intimate partner relationships to provide a new lens through which to view the conceptual debates on naming, defining and understanding 'domestic violence', as well as the policy and practice implications that flow from them. We argue that the reduction of domestic violence to discrete 'incidents' supports and maintains how men themselves talk about their use of violence, and that this in turn overlaps with contentions about the appropriate interventions and responses to domestic violence perpetrators. We revisit Hearn's 1998 work The Violences of Men, connecting it to Stark's later concept of coercive control, in order to develop and extend understandings of violence through analysis of the words of those who use it. We conclude by exploring the implications of these findings for recent legal reform in England and Wales and for policies on how we deal with perpetrators.