Collaborative and Ubiquitous Consumer Oriented Trusted Service Manager

Collaborative and Ubiquitous Consumer Oriented Trusted Service Manager
复制标题

协作且无处不在的面向消费者的可信服务管理器

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
2014 IEEE 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Sauveron
D. Sauveron
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Raja Naeem Akram;K. Markantonakis;D. Sauveron

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

近场通信(NFC)使移动电话能够模拟非接触式智能卡。这重新激活了多应用智能卡计划。可信服务管理器(TSM)是一个实体,在提议和试用的基于nfc的智能卡生态系统中,它受到所有利益相关者的信任。然而,基于tsm的模型有可能造成市场隔离,这可能导致有限或缓慢的采用。此外,所有主要的利益相关者(例如电信和银行)都在推动他们自己的TSM模型,这可能会阻碍部署。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于协作和无处不在的面向消费者的可信服务管理器(CO-TSM)的模型,该模型结合了不同的TSM模型,同时为整个体系结构提供了可伸缩性。此外,我们的建议还为消费者和应用程序提供者提供了灵活性。为了支持我们的提议,我们提出了一个基于两种对比方法的核心架构:以发行者为中心的智能卡所有权模型(ICOM)和以用户为中心的智能卡所有权模型(UCOM)。在核心体系结构的基础上,提出了应用程序下载框架和安全通道协议的建议。最后,讨论了安全信道协议的实现经验和性能度量。
Near Field Communication (NFC) enables a mobile phone to emulate a contactless smart card. This has reinvigorated the multiapplication smart card initiative. Trusted Service Manager (TSM) is an entity that is trusted by all stakeholders in the proposed and trialled NFC-based smart card ecosystem. However, TSM-based models have the potential to create market segregation that might lead to limited or slow adoption. In addition, all major stakeholders (e.g. Telecom and banks) are pushing for their own TSM models and this might hinder deployment. In this paper we present a Collaborative and Ubiquitous Consumer Oriented Trusted Service Manager (CO-TSM) based model that combines different TSM models while providing scalability to the overall architecture. In addition, our proposal also provides flexibility to both consumers and application providers. To support our proposal, we present a core architecture based on two contrasting approaches: the Issuer Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (ICOM) and the User Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (UCOM). Based on the core architecture, we then describe our proposal for an application download framework and a secure channel protocol. Finally, the implementation experience and performance measurements for the secure channel protocol are discussed.