Measurement resources for dissemination and implementation research in health.
Measurement resources for dissemination and implementation research in health.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s13012-016-0401-y
复制
发表时间：
2016-03-22
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Glasgow RE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rabin BA;Lewis CC;Norton WE;Neta G;Chambers D;Tobin JN;Brownson RC;Glasgow RE
由美国国立卫生研究院和退伍军人管理局主办的为期两天的协商一致工作会议，重点讨论了与衡量和报告中的传播和实施(D&I)研究有关的问题。与会者包括来自美国和加拿大的23名研究人员、实践者和决策者，他们的结论是，该领域将极大地受益于衡量资源，以增强D&I评估工作的简易性、协调性和严格性。本文描述了D&I措施的环境扫描和文献回顾的发现。我们总共确定了17个资源，包括4个基于Web的存储库和12个静态审查或工具，这些资源试图综合和评估D&I研究的现有衡量标准。13个资源来自健康学科，11个资源来自数据库审查。其中10个侧重于量化测量，所有这些都是作为研究人员的资源产生的。14个是根据既定的D&I理论或框架组织的，其结构和措施的数量从1个到450多个不等。测量元数据的变化很大，只有6个元数据提供了有关测量的心理测量属性的信息。还需要就制定和使用措施提供更多指导。讨论了一些方法、资源和未来工作的关键领域。鼓励研究人员和利益攸关方利用支持这类工作的若干供资机制。本文的在线版本(doi：10.1186/s13012-0160401-y)包含补充材料，授权用户可以使用。
A 2-day consensus working meeting, hosted by the United States National Institutes of Health and the Veterans Administration, focused on issues related to dissemination and implementation (D&I) research in measurement and reporting. Meeting participants included 23 researchers, practitioners, and decision makers from the USA and Canada who concluded that the field would greatly benefit from measurement resources to enhance the ease, harmonization, and rigor of D&I evaluation efforts. This paper describes the findings from an environmental scan and literature review of resources for D&I measures. We identified a total of 17 resources, including four web-based repositories and 12 static reviews or tools that attempted to synthesize and evaluate existing measures for D&I research. Thirteen resources came from the health discipline, and 11 were populated from database reviews. Ten focused on quantitative measures, and all were generated as a resource for researchers. Fourteen were organized according to an established D&I theory or framework, with the number of constructs and measures ranging from 1 to more than 450. Measure metadata was quite variable with only six providing information on the psychometric properties of measures. Additional guidance on the development and use of measures are needed. A number of approaches, resources, and critical areas for future work are discussed. Researchers and stakeholders are encouraged to take advantage of a number of funding mechanisms supporting this type of work. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0401-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.