Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI.
Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI.
复制标题
使用多参数MRI的无监督分类方法进行脑肿瘤分割的比较。
DOI:
10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.021
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Van Huffel, S.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sauwen, N.;Acou, M.;Van Cauter, S.;Sima, D. M.;Veraart, J.;Maes, F.;Himmelreich, U.;Achten, E.;Van Huffel, S.
关键词:
Tumor segmentation is a particularly challenging task in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), as they are among the most heterogeneous tumors in oncology. An accurate delineation of the lesion and its main subcomponents contributes to optimal treatment planning, prognosis and follow-up. Conventional MRI (cMRI) is the imaging modality of choice for manual segmentation, and is also considered in the vast majority of automated segmentation studies. Advanced MRI modalities such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) have already shown their added value in tumor tissue characterization, hence there have been recent suggestions of combining different MRI modalities into a multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) approach for brain tumor segmentation. In this paper, we compare the performance of several unsupervised classification methods for HGG segmentation based on MP-MRI data including cMRI, DWI, MRSI and PWI. Two independent MP-MRI datasets with a different acquisition protocol were available from different hospitals. We demonstrate that a hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization variant which was previously introduced for MP-MRI tumor segmentation gives the best performance in terms of mean Dice-scores for the pathologic tissue classes on both datasets. Unsupervised classification algorithms are applied for brain tumor segmentation on multi-parametric MRI datasets. Reported mean Dice-scores are in the range of state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms. Hierarchical NMF obtained the best segmentation results in terms of mean Dice-scores for most of the tissue classes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
15.9
作者:
Jones TL;Byrnes TJ;Yang G;Howe FA;Bell BA;Barrick TR
通讯作者:
Barrick TR
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Gillis, Nicolas
通讯作者:
Gillis, Nicolas
影响因子:
15.9
作者:
Hu LS;Eschbacher JM;Heiserman JE;Dueck AC;Shapiro WR;Liu S;Karis JP;Smith KA;Coons SW;Nakaji P;Spetzler RF;Feuerstein BG;Debbins J;Baxter LC
通讯作者:
Baxter LC
影响因子:
--
作者:
Ion-Margineanu A;Van Cauter S;Sima DM;Maes F;Van Gool SW;Sunaert S;Himmelreich U;Van Huffel S
通讯作者:
Van Huffel S
DOI:
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x
发表时间:
1977-01-01
期刊:
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL
影响因子:
--
作者:
DEMPSTER, AP;LAIRD, NM;RUBIN, DB
通讯作者:
RUBIN, DB