Improving Wellness of Operating Room Personnel: A Light-Based Intervention on Perceived Nursing-Related Stress.
Improving Wellness of Operating Room Personnel: A Light-Based Intervention on Perceived Nursing-Related Stress.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyt.2021.718194
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Di Maria S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Guerrier G;Margetis D;Agostini C;Machroub Z;Di Maria S
背景：护理是一项情感要求高、体力消耗大的工作。卫生保健工作者的幸福感是取得护理成功并与其他卫生专业人员保持良好合作关系的关键。目的：本研究的目的是评估光为基础的干预对在手术室环境中工作的医护人员感受到的护理相关压力的有效性。方法：共有84名护士参加了这项随机、交叉对照研究。干预措施包括使用LED头戴式便携式设备进行4周的明亮蓝光照射(n=42)或不进行光暴露(n=42)，并以交叉方式隔开2周的洗涤期。参与者完成护理压力量表(NSS)的调查问卷。结果：干预组和对照组在人口统计学方面具有可比性，中位年龄为34岁(IQR：27-49)和69(82%)女性。干预前两组患者的平均基线NSS评分相似。干预组干预后焦虑自评量表评分显著低于基线评分：干预前后两次干预前后的差异分别为15.1SD7.6(p<；0.001)和19.7SD7.5(p<；0.001)。干预后的跨组比较，干预组干预后的NSS评分差值显著高于对照组：干预后两个连续阶段分别为15.1SD7.6比1.4(SD8.4)(p<；0.001)和19.7sSD7.5比1.7(SD8.9)(p<；0.001)。结论：应考虑其他以人为本的举措，以改善手术室卫生工作人员的福祉，特别是在冠状病毒大流行期间。
Background: Nursing is an emotionally demanding and physically draining occupation. Well-being of health care workers is essential to achieve success in care and have good cooperation relationships with other health professionals. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a light-based intervention on perceived nursing-related stress in health care personnel working in an operating room environment. Methods: A total of 84 nurses participated in this randomized, cross-over controlled study. Intervention consisted of 4 weeks of bright blue-enriched light exposure using a LED head-mounted portable device (n = 42) or no light exposure (n = 42) separated by a 2-week washout period in a crossover fashion. Participants completes questionnaires for the Nursing Stress Scale (NSS). Results: Intervention and control groups were comparable in terms of demographics, with a median age of 34 (IQR: 27–49) and 69 (82%) female. The mean baseline NSS score was similar in both groups before intervention. The NSS score of the intervention group was significantly lower after intervention than the baseline score: the NSS score difference before and after intervention was 15.1 (SD 7.6) (p < 0.001) and 19.7 (SD 7.5) (p < 0.001) during the two successive periods of intervention, respectively. The cross-group comparison after intervention showed a significantly higher NSS score difference after intervention in the intervention group than the control group: 15.1 (SD 7.6) vs. 1.4 (SD 8.4) (p < 0.001) and 19.7 (SD 7.5) vs. 1.7 (SD 8.9) (p < 0.001) during the two successive periods of intervention, respectively. Conclusion: Alternative person-directed initiatives should be considered to improve the well-being of the health workforce in operating rooms, especially during the coronavirus pandemic.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Bragard, I.;Coucke, P. A.
通讯作者：
Coucke, P. A.
影响因子：
3
作者：
Arora, Sonal;Sevdalis, Nick;Kneebone, Roger
通讯作者：
Kneebone, Roger
DOI：
10.1007/s00464-002-9224-9
发表时间：
2003-09-01
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Moorthy, K;Munz, Y;Darzi, A
通讯作者：
Darzi, A
影响因子：
3
作者：
Wetzel, CM;Kneebone, RL;Darzi, A
通讯作者：
Darzi, A
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Siporin, Sheldon
通讯作者：
Siporin, Sheldon