Chronic and temporary distinct expectancies as comparison standards: automatic contrast in dispositional judgments.
Chronic and temporary distinct expectancies as comparison standards: automatic contrast in dispositional judgments.
复制标题
长期和暂时的不同预期作为比较标准：性格判断中的自动对比。
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.365
复制
发表时间：
2001
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Reich,DA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Weary,G;Tobin,SJ;Reich,DA
在4项研究中，作者研究了是否使结果期望不同导致其作为比较标准，从而在对比倾向性推断目标的行为。研究的预期是基于长期的未来事件预期（研究1）或临时的，操纵的预期标准（研究2-4）。分析表明，当语境期望与目标信息不同或可分离时，被试的倾向性判断在认知负荷下与目标信息形成对比，在无负荷下被试的倾向性判断被过度修正（同化）。这些影响是由参与者的行为分类介导的。证据表明，一个程序化的形式校正任务的难度和一个努力的意识为基础的校正的影响expectances. Results检查在最近的模型中的倾向性推理过程。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
In 4 studies, the authors examined whether making outcome expectancies distinct resulted in their use as comparison standards and, consequently, in contrastive dispositional inferences for a target's behaviors. The expectancies examined were based on either chronic future-event expectancies (Study 1) or temporary, manipulated expectancy standards (Studies 2–4). Analyses revealed that when contextual expectancies were distinct or separable from target information, participants' dispositional judgments were contrasted from them under cognitive load and overcorrected (assimilated to them) under no load. These effects were mediated by participants' behavior categorizations. Evidence suggestive of a proceduralized form of correction for task difficulty and an effortful awareness-based correction for the effects of expectancies also were found. Results are examined in light of recent models of the dispositional inference process.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)