Is There a Latin American Model of the University?
Is There a Latin American Model of the University?
复制标题
是否存在拉丁美洲大学模式?
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
A. Bernasconi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Bernasconi
and general construct, a concept of the university as it exists in the minds of faculty, students, administrators, and other constituencies and is expressed in their discourse about the university. At the same time, a model is a set of instructions for action, a patterned way of doing things. In this case it refers to going about organizing, governing, and operating a university and being an administrator, a professor, or a student. For our purposes, then, a model of the university can be defined as a culturally embedded idea of the essence, role, and mode of organization of the university and of its relationship to the state and to society at large, which exerts a normative influence over those who are in a position to shape such a role, organization, and relationships. A model may exist even if no university can be found that corresponds neatly to it, as long as the effort continues to be made by “university people” to shape reality into the form defined by the idea of the university and as long as even partial success in this endeavor helps sustain the model of the university in the minds of those who can shape it. For this reason, in my effort to elucidate the existence of models and 3 As of 2003, Brazil had 3.9 million students at the tertiary level, representing a gross enrollment rate of 18.2 percent. Mexico’s figures for the same year were 2.2 million and 21.5 percent, respectively, while Argentina stood at 1.5 million and 56 percent, and Chile’s numbers were 570,000 and 37.5 percent (CESOP 2005). 4 The source is the Science and Technology Indicators of Chile’s National Scientific and Technological Council (CONICYT). 5 In this sense, a model is not a Weberian ideal type (Weber 1949). An ideal type is purely heuristic, rests on a priori assumptions (as economic models, for instance, usually posit conditions of perfect competition and rational behavior), and carries no normative weight. It is never a “model for.” An ideal type does have a superficial similarity with the notion of “model of,” inasmuch as they both emerge as mental constructs synthesized from many varied individual experiences. However, the key difference is that the ideal type is a mental construct in the mind of the researcher, not in her subject’s, whereas a model is only such if it resides in the minds of the observed actors and affects their behavior.