Immigrant Killers: Introduced Predators and the Conservation of Birds in New Zealand Carolyn King Oxford University Press, 1984 224 pp. £29·50

Immigrant Killers: Introduced Predators and the Conservation of Birds in New Zealand Carolyn King Oxford University Press, 1984 224 pp. £29·50
复制标题

移民杀手:新西兰的掠食者和鸟类保护 卡罗琳·金 牛津大学出版社,1984 年 224 页 29·50 英镑

DOI:
10.1017/s0030605300020093
复制
发表时间:
1986
期刊:
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Christopher Lever
Christopher Lever
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Christopher Lever

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这可能表明我不够老练,但那些使用“生态中心主义”和“技术中心主义”等词汇的书籍真的让我恼火。当我读到这样一句话:O‘Riordan描述的技术中心主义连续体出现在20世纪80年代,政治共识吸纳了环保主义,这样他们就可以保持对从丰盛主义到通融的过渡的控制,从而击退任何试图更激进地解决增长-环境破坏-社会正义戏剧的尝试。我想打电话给《私家侦探》的编辑Pseuds Corner。环境政策:《国际评论》并不完全被这些令人费解(至少对我来说)的术语所主导,但也有一些公平的零星术语。
It may show my lack of sophistication, but books that use words like 'ecocentrism' and 'technocentrism' really drive me up the wall. When I read a sentence like 'the technocenrric continuum described by O'Riordan emerged in the 1980s, with the political consensus co-opting environmentalism so that they can retain control over the transition from cornucopianism to accommodation, thereby repelling any attempts at any more radical solutions to the growth-environmental damage-social justice drama', I want to telephone the editor of 'Pseuds Corner' in Private Eye. Environmental Policies: An International Review is not totally dominated by such unintelligible (at least to me) jargon, but there is a fair smattering.