A Critical Notice of: Frame It Again: New Tools for Rational Decision-Making
A Critical Notice of: Frame It Again: New Tools for Rational Decision-Making
复制标题
重要通知：重新构建：理性决策的新工具
DOI：
10.1080/09672559.2022.2057685
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Sarah A. Fisher
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sarah A. Fisher
J·L·贝穆德斯认为，当用另一种“框架”来描述同一事物时，以不同的方式评价它可能是合理的。他的核心例子取自同名戏剧，阿伽门农率领希腊舰队对抗特洛伊，为巴黎绑架海伦报仇。阿伽门农面临着以下两难境地：当舰队在奥利斯停顿时，预言家卡尔卡斯解释了一个预兆--两只鹰俯冲下来捕杀并吃掉一只怀孕的野兔。当卡尔卡斯解释这一预兆时，它反映了女神阿尔特弥斯对特洛伊无辜被杀的前景的不满。风的缺乏也有同样的原因。卡尔卡斯说，唯一的解决办法就是让阿伽门农把自己的女儿伊菲革尼娅献祭给女神。
JL Bermúdez argues that it can be rational to evaluate the same thing differently when it is described using alternative ‘frames’. His central example, taken from the eponymous play, sees Agamemnon leading the Greek fleet against Troy, to avenge the abduction of Helen by Paris. Agamemnon is faced with the following dilemma:While the fleet is becalmed at Aulis, the prophet Calchas interprets a portent–two eagles swooping down to kill and eat a pregnant hare. As Calchas interprets the portent, it reflects the displeasure of the goddess Artemis at the prospect of innocents being killed at Troy. The lack of wind has the same source. The only solution, says Calchas, is for Agamemnon to sacrifice to the goddess his own daughter Iphigenia.(Bermúdez 2020, 7)