Political and media discourses about integrating refugees in the UK
Political and media discourses about integrating refugees in the UK
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ejsp.2595
复制
发表时间：
2019-06-27
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Kirkwood, Steve
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Goodman, Simon;Kirkwood, Steve
本文论述了在“难民危机”的背景下，在英国融入难民的政治和媒体话语。一个话语心理学的方法是最好的方式来理解什么谈论的概念是用来完成这些辩论。一个大型语料库的政治讨论（13个小时的辩论具有146名政治家）和960份报纸文章从英国话语分析。分析确定了融合方面的五个困境：融合是积极和必要的，但具有挑战性;收容社区被认为是欢迎的，但其能力有限;难民对融合负责，但收容社区需要提供支持;好的难民融入，坏的难民不融入;难民易受伤害，但有技能。所有这些都被用来证明是否将难民包括在内。因此，西方国家支持难民的责任取决于难民的具体行为方式。
This article addresses political and media discourses about integrating refugees in the UK in the context of the "refugee crisis". A discursive psychological approach is presented as the best way to understand what talk about the concept is used to accomplish in these debates. A large corpus of political discussions (13 hours of debate featuring 146 politicians) and 960 newspaper articles from the UK were discourse analysed. The analysis identified five dilemmas about integration: Integration is positive and necessary, but challenging; Host communities are presented as welcoming, but there are limits to their capacity; Refugees are responsible for integration, but host communities need to provide support; Good refugees integrate, bad ones don't; Refugees are vulnerable and are skilled. All are used to warrant the inclusion or exclusion of refugees. The responsibility of western nations to support refugees is therefore contingent on the refugees behaving in specific ways.