Effects of BRCA1/2 on Ovarian and Breast Cancer Survival--Response.
Effects of BRCA1/2 on Ovarian and Breast Cancer Survival--Response.
复制标题
BRCA1/2 对卵巢癌和乳腺癌生存的影响——反应。
DOI:
10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0931
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hwang,Wei-Ting
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhong,Qian;Peng,Hong-Ling;Zhao,Xia;Zhang,Lin;Hwang,Wei-Ting
Regarding the first point, we want to point out one advantage of using hazard ratio (HR) as an overall measure of association is that HR is irrelevant to a specific time point (eg, 5 or 10 years), because HR estimates the true ratio of two underlying hazards and the ratio is assumed to be constant over time. Varying follow-up durations may potentially influence the width of the confidence interval (CI), which is already factored into the calculation of the combined HR. We had repeated the meta-analysis using the 10-year HR estimate from McLaughlin and colleagues (3) instead of the 5-year HR and obtained almost identical results. Meta-analysis does not require studies to have comparable follow-up. We believe that our combined HR as an overall measure of association remains valid.Regarding the second point, the P value of 0.008 reported in Boyd and colleagues (4) was based on a log-rank (Cox–Mantel) test, so theoretically their results could be different from results estimated by a Cox PH model if the underlying hazard functions are not entirely proportional to each other, as suggested by Fig. 2 (4). The technique of estimating HR by reading KM curve directly performs well if there are a sufficient number of subjects and events and if the observation intervals are adequate (5), such as in that study.