Effects of BRCA1/2 on Ovarian and Breast Cancer Survival--Response.

Effects of BRCA1/2 on Ovarian and Breast Cancer Survival--Response.
复制标题

BRCA1/2 对卵巢癌和乳腺癌生存的影响——反应。

DOI:
10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0931
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hwang,Wei-Ting
Hwang,Wei-Ting
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhong,Qian;Peng,Hong-Ling;Zhao,Xia;Zhang,Lin;Hwang,Wei-Ting

文献摘要

相似文献

关于第一点,我们想指出的是,使用风险比(HR)作为关联性的总体指标的一个优点是,HR与特定时间点(例如,5年或10年)无关,因为HR估计了两种潜在风险的真实比率,并且该比率被假设为随时间推移而保持不变。不同的随访持续时间可能会影响置信区间(CI)的宽度,这已经被考虑到合并HR的计算中。我们使用McLaughlin及其同事的10年HR估计值(3)而不是5年HR重复了荟萃分析,获得了几乎相同的结果。荟萃分析不要求研究具有可比性的随访。我们认为,我们的联合HR作为关联的总体指标仍然有效。关于第二点,Boyd及其同事(4)报告的P值0.008是基于对数秩(Cox-Mantel)检验,因此理论上,如果潜在的风险函数彼此不完全成比例,则它们的结果可能与通过考克斯PH模型估计的结果不同,如图2(4)所示。如果有足够数量的受试者和事件,并且观察间隔足够(5),则通过阅读KM曲线直接估计HR的技术性能良好,例如在该研究中。
Regarding the first point, we want to point out one advantage of using hazard ratio (HR) as an overall measure of association is that HR is irrelevant to a specific time point (eg, 5 or 10 years), because HR estimates the true ratio of two underlying hazards and the ratio is assumed to be constant over time. Varying follow-up durations may potentially influence the width of the confidence interval (CI), which is already factored into the calculation of the combined HR. We had repeated the meta-analysis using the 10-year HR estimate from McLaughlin and colleagues (3) instead of the 5-year HR and obtained almost identical results. Meta-analysis does not require studies to have comparable follow-up. We believe that our combined HR as an overall measure of association remains valid.Regarding the second point, the P value of 0.008 reported in Boyd and colleagues (4) was based on a log-rank (Cox–Mantel) test, so theoretically their results could be different from results estimated by a Cox PH model if the underlying hazard functions are not entirely proportional to each other, as suggested by Fig. 2 (4). The technique of estimating HR by reading KM curve directly performs well if there are a sufficient number of subjects and events and if the observation intervals are adequate (5), such as in that study.