The Invisibility of Privilege: A critique of intersectional models of identity
The Invisibility of Privilege: A critique of intersectional models of identity
复制标题
特权的隐形：对身份交叉模型的批判
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Anna Carastathis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anna Carastathis
在本文中，我认为交叉性是概念化轴心或压迫体系（种族、阶级、性别）之间关系的普遍方式，非法地引入了它声称要克服的模型：即统一的身份模型。我首先定义“交叉性”并区分经常被混淆的三种含义。然后我对模型进行分析批判，揭示其隐藏的关于身份的预设。最后，我认为团结对于女权主义实践来说是比包含“差异”更好的规范，而“差异”似乎是许多交叉账户背后的规范。
In this paper, I argue that intersectionality, the prevailing way of conceptualizing the relation between axes or systems of oppression (race, class, gender), illicitly imports the very model it purports to overcome: that is, the unitary model of identity. I first define “intersectionality” and distinguish between three senses that are frequently conflated. Then I subject the model to an analytic critique, revealing its hidden presuppositions about identity. Finally, I suggest that solidarity serves as a better norm for feminist practice than inclusion of “difference,” which seems to be the norm underlying many intersectional accounts.