Burnout in dental students: effectiveness of different methods
Burnout in dental students: effectiveness of different methods
复制标题
牙科学生的倦怠：不同方法的有效性
DOI：
10.1590/s1807-25772013000500002
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Marôco
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Campos;P. C. Jordani;M. Zucoloto;F. Bonafé;J. Marôco
目的：本研究旨在评估不同方法对口腔专业学生职业倦怠综合征的筛查效果。材料和方法：使用Oldenburg学生量表（OLBI-SS）和哥本哈根学生量表（CBI-SS）进行倦怠综合征评估。Maslach倦怠量表学生调查（MBI-SS）被用作金标准。测量了仪器的心理测量特性。估计二阶分层模型来计算OLBI-SS和CBI-SS的总分，构建ROC曲线并估计面积（AUROC）。结果：共有235名本科生参与了这项研究。该工具显示出足够的信度和效度，但有三个问题已从OLBI-SS和CBI-SS中删除。OLBI-SS的耗竭维度、CBI-SS的个人倦怠和学习倦怠维度具有较好的区分力。结论：CBI-SS比OLBI-SS显示出更高的识别能力，以识别倦怠综合征（DAUROC=.172 [.103-.240]; p<.05）。
OBJECTIVE: This study was proposed to estimate the effectiveness of different screening methods of the Burnout Syndrome among dental students. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The Burnout Syndrome assessment was performed using the Oldenburg Inventory-Student survey (OLBI-SS) and the Copenhagen Inventory-Student survey (CBI‑SS). The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student survey (MBI-SS) was used as the gold standard. The psychometric properties of the instruments were measured. The second-order hierarchical model was estimated to calculate the overall scores for OLBI-SS and CBI-SS, and ROC curves were constructed and the areas were estimated (AUROC). RESULT: A total of 235 undergraduate students participated in this study. The instruments showed an adequate reliability and validity; however three questions had to be removed from OLBI-SS and one from CBI-SS. The Exhaustion dimension of OLBI-SS, and Personal Burnout and Study related Burnout of CBI-SS presented a good discriminating capacity. CONCLUSION: CBI-SS showed higher discriminating capacity, than OLBI-SS, to identify the Burnout Syndrome (DAUROC=.172 [.103-.240]; p<.05).