Collaborative Interpretation of Survivors’ Accounts: A Radical Challenge to Conventional Practice
Collaborative Interpretation of Survivors’ Accounts: A Radical Challenge to Conventional Practice
复制标题
幸存者叙述的协作解释：对传统实践的根本挑战
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Greenspan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Greenspan
根据一次性的“证词”来解释大屠杀幸存者的叙述，而不知道幸存者的叙述的多个版本，它在时间和人际空间中的排列，并且在没有参与幸存者自己对这些排列的反思的情况下，可能会导致我们严重误入歧途。基于他近40年来采访幸存者的经验，以及他作为临床心理学家的背景，作者认为，与传统方法相比，对建立在持续和合作关系基础上的幸存者的采访往往会产生不同的、更可靠的解释。一个特定的幸存者的复述-其“证词”的一部分，往往是由其他人解释-的密切分析是用来记录这些主张。
Interpretation of Holocaust survivors’ accounts based on one-time ‘testimonies’, without knowing the multiple versions of a survivor’s account, its permutations in time and interpersonal space, and in the absence of engaging a survivor’s own reflections on those permutations, can lead us seriously astray. Based on his nearly 40 years of interviewing survivors, and his background as a clinical psychologist, the author argues that interviews with survivors grounded in sustained and collaborative relationships often yield different, and more reliable, interpretations than those that emerge from conventional approaches. A close analysis of one particular survivor’s retelling – part of whose ‘testimony’ has often been interpreted by others – is used to document these assertions.