ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol. 75 Issue 02
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol. 75 Issue 02
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Elke U. Weber;Christopher K. Hsee
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Elke U. Weber;Christopher K. Hsee
两项研究试图区分最近报道的发现，即来自中华人民共和国（PRC）的中国人比美国人更喜欢冒险的情景经济和文化解释。这两项研究都比较了中美两国有关风险和冒险的谚语。第一项研究将德国作为对照组，因为它的社会经济与美国相似，但在社会安全网和文化集体主义方面与中国更相似。每种文化的成员分别根据隐含的建议（承担或避免风险）和对金融或社会风险的适用性，对美国、中国和德国与风险相关的谚语进行评级。结果与对风险承担民族差异的文化解释一致：（a）中国和德国谚语被认为比美国谚语提供更多的寻求风险的建议;（B）美国谚语被认为比中国和德国谚语更不适用于社会领域的风险;（c）无论
Two studies attempted to discriminate between a situationaleconomic and a cultural explanation for the recently reported finding that Chinese from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are more risk-seeking than Americans. Both studies compared American and Chinese proverbs related to risk and risk-taking. The first study added Germany as a control group for its socioeconomic similarity to the United States but its closer resemblance to the PRC in its social safety-net and cultural collectivism. Members of each culture rated American, Chinese, and German riskrelated proverbs, respectively, on implied advice (to take or avoid risk) and applicability to financial or social risks. Results were consistent with the cultural explanation of national differences in risk taking: (a) Chinese and German proverbs were judged to provide more risk-seeking advice than American proverbs; (b) American proverbs were judged less applicable to risks in the social domain than Chinese and German proverbs; (c) regardless