Zur Getrennt‑, Zusammen‑ und Bindestrichschreibung von Substantivkomposita im Deutschen (1550–1710)
Zur Getrennt‑, Zusammen‑ und Bindestrichschreibung von Substantivkomposita im Deutschen (1550–1710)
复制标题
Zur Getrennt-, Zusammen- und Bindestrichschreibung von Substantivkomposita im Deutschen (1550–1710)
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Daniel Solling
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daniel Solling
本文考察了1550年至1710年早期新高地德语中复合名词是封闭式（写成一个词）、开放式（写成单独的词）还是连字符的变化。由于这一时期的德语没有正字法规范，因此这一时期德语的正字法现象是一个很有研究价值的课题。由于本文旨在展示一个历时性的发展，语料库文本来源于以1550年、1570年、1600年、1620年、1660年和1710年为中心的六个时间窗口。研究结果表明，从1550年到1620年，复合名词的出现率约为80%。当时这种书写方式几乎占了主导地位。在最后两个时间窗口的文本中，连字符的使用范围扩大，到1710年，近三分之二的复合名词实例都使用连字符书写。本研究还表明，在复合名词的单词、单词和连字符写作中，语篇的地理来源并不重要。然而，真正的复合名词（在无标记格中带有修饰语的复合名词）和人造的复合名词（在斜格中带有修饰语的复合名词）之间的区别似乎具有更大的相关性。与真正的复合名词相比，人工复合名词在1550年至1620年间的封闭程度较小，而从1660年起，连字符的程度较高。在研究的第二部分中，不同时间窗口的复合名词从词汇的角度进行了考察，这表明许多复合名词词素在每个时间窗口内的所有出现中几乎一致地以相同的方式书写（作为一个词、作为单独的词、或具有连字符）。
This thesis investigates the changes in whether compound nouns were closed (written as one word), open (written as separate words) or hyphenated in Early New High German between 1550 and 1710. Due to the fact that there were no orthographic norms in the German of this time, graphematic phenomena in this period of the German language are very fruitful to examine.The study is based on a corpus of 249 sermons in 90 different postils. Since this thesis aims to show a diachronic development, the corpus texts originate from six time windows centred around the years 1550, 1570, 1600, 1620, 1660 and 1710.The results of the study show a general development from 1550, when around 80% of the occurrences of compound nouns were written as one word, to 1620, when this way of writing dominated almost entirely. In the texts from the last two time windows, the hyphenation spreads, and by 1710, nearly two thirds of the instances of compound nouns were written with a hyphen. The present study also shows that the geographical origin of a text is of lesser importance for the writing of compound nouns as one word, separate words or with a hyphen. However, the distinction between genuine compound nouns (a compound noun with the modifier in an unmarked case) and artificial ones (a compound noun with the modifier in an oblique case) seems to be of greater relevance. The artificial compound nouns are closed to a lesser extent in the period between 1550 and 1620 and hyphenated to a higher extent from 1660 onwards than the genuine compound nouns.In a second part of the study, the compound nouns of the different time windows are examined from a lexical point of view, showing that many compound noun lexemes were almost consistently written in the same way (either as one word, as separate words, or with a hyphen) in all occurrences within each time window.