EFFECTS OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING ON STIMULUS GENERALIZATION FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS
EFFECTS OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING ON STIMULUS GENERALIZATION FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0025116
复制
发表时间：
1967-01-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
THOMAS, DR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DOLL, TJ;THOMAS, DR
3组15 ss分别进行波长识别训练，以响应s +(530 mm)，而不响应s -（分别为540、550和590 mm）。15个对照组接受指示，只对s +作出反应，但不进行歧视培训。然后测试所有ss对s +两侧波长的泛化。相对于对照梯度，540和550 μ m s组均表现出从s +向s -相反方向的响应模式位移。然而，与动物文献相反，550s组表现出更大的位移，590s组产生的梯度比对照组更平坦。这些差异归因于人类对刺激标记和分类的使用。（PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2017 APA，版权所有）
3 GROUPS OF 15 SS EACH WERE GIVEN WAVELENGTH DISCRIMINATION TRAINING TO RESPOND TO THE S+(530 MILLIMICRONS) BUT NOT TO S-(540, 550, AND 590 MILLIMICRONS, RESPECTIVELY). 15 CONTROLS RECEIVED INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND ONLY TO S+ BUT NO DISCRIMINATION TRAINING. ALL SS WERE THEN TESTED FOR GENERALIZATION TO WAVELENGTHS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE S+. RELATIVE TO THE CONTROL GRADIENT, BOTH THE 540 MILLIMICRON S-AND 550 MILLIMICRON S-GROUPS SHOWED DISPLACEMENT OF THE MODE OF RESPONDING FROM S+ IN THE DIRECTION OPPOSITE TO S-. CONTRARY TO THE ANIMAL LITERATURE, HOWEVER, THE 550 S-GROUP EXHIBITED THE GREATER DISPLACEMENT, AND THE 590 S-GROUP YIELDED A GRADIENT RELIABLY FLATTER THAN THAT OF THE CONTROL GROUP. THESE DISCREPANCIES ARE ATTRIBUTED TO HUMAN SS'USE OF STIMULUS LABELING AND CATEGORIZATION.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)